| Independent verification and validation: a missing link in simulation methodology? |
| Full text |
Pdf
(661 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation
table of contents
Coronado, California, United States
Pages: 230 - 236
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-7803-3383-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
James D. Arthur
|
Systems Research Center and The Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
|
|
Richard E. Nance
|
Systems Research Center and The Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
IEEE Computer Society
Washington, DC, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 4
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Independent verification and validation (IV&V) is a powerful tool that can be used to mitigate the increasing complexities associated with an ever-expanding set of modeling and simulation problems. In this paper we discuss the use of independent V&V within the modeling and simulation community. Literature reviews and conversations with experienced technical managers serve as a basis for our conjecture that (a) validation is the major focus of most modeling and simulation efforts, (b) verification plays only a secondary role, and (c) independent V&V is, for all practical purposes, being ignored. In an effort to raise the awareness of the benefits and applicability of independent V&V within the modeling and simulation community, we describe in a step-by-step fashion the application of independent V&V to one particular life cycle model of a simulation study.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Balci, O. (1994). Validation Verification, and Testing Techniques Throughout the Cycle of a Simulation Study. Annals of Operations Research 53, 121-173.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Cassandras, C.G. (1993). Discrete Event Systems - Modeling and Performance Analysis. Homewood, IL: Aksen Associates Incorporated.
|
| |
5
|
Don Caughlin, Verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A) of models and simulations through reduced order metamodels, Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation, p.1405-1412, December 03-06, 1995, Arlington, Virginia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/224401.224832]
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Nance, R.E. (1994). The Conical Methodology and the Evolution of Simulation Model Development. Annals of Operations Research 53, 1-46.
|
 |
13
|
Dale K. Pace, Naval modeling and simulation verification, validation, and accreditation, Proceedings of the 25th conference on Winter simulation, p.1077-1080, December 12-15, 1993, Los Angeles, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/256563.256966]
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Schmben, L.W. (1992). SIGMA: Graphical Simulation Modeling Program. San Francisco, CA: The Scientific Press.
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juri Tolujev , Peter Lorenz , Daniel Beier , Thomas J. Schriber, Assessment of simulation models based on trace-file analysis: a metamodeling approach, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.443-450, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
|
|
|
|
|