| Implementing the batch means method in simulation experiments |
| Full text |
Pdf
(712 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation
table of contents
Coronado, California, United States
Pages: 214 - 221
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-7803-3383-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Christos Alexopoulos
|
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
Andrew F. Seila
|
Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
IEEE Computer Society
Washington, DC, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 25, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper reviews and evaluates strategies for implementing the batch means method for estimating the mean of a stationary simulation output process.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Blomqvist, N. 1967. The covariance function of the M/G/1 queueing system. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 50:157-174.
|
| |
2
|
Carlstein. E. 1986. The use of subseries for estimating the variance of a general statistic from a stationary sequence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14:1171-1179.
|
| |
3
|
Chien, C.-H. 1989. Small sample theory for steady state confidence intervals. Technical Report No. 37, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Conway, R. W. 1963. Some tactical problems in digital simulation. Management Science 10:47-61.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Fishman, G. S. 1978a. Grouping observations in digital simulation. Management Science 24:510-521.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Fishman, G. S. 1996. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York.
|
| |
10
|
Fishman, G. S., and L. S. Yarberry. 1994. An implementation of the batch means method. Technical Report UNC/OR/TR/93-1, Department of Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Heyman, D. P., and M. J. Sobel. 1982. Stochastic Models in Operations Research, Volume i. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
|
| |
13
|
Law, A. M., and J. S. Carson. 1979. A sequential procedure for determining the length of a steadystate simulation. Operations Research 27:1011- 1025.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Schmeiser, B. W. 1982. Batch size effects in the analysis of simulation output. Operations Research 30:556-568.
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Song, W.-M. T. 1996. On the estimation of optimal batch sizes in the analysis of simulation output. To appear in European Journal of Operations Research.
|
| |
20
|
yon Neumann, J. 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference and the variance. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12:367- 395.
|
 |
21
|
|
|