ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Implementing the batch means method in simulation experiments
Full text PdfPdf (712 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Coronado, California, United States
Pages: 214 - 221  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-7803-3383-7
Authors
Christos Alexopoulos  School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Andrew F. Seila  Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/256562.256608
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews and evaluates strategies for implementing the batch means method for estimating the mean of a stationary simulation output process.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Blomqvist, N. 1967. The covariance function of the M/G/1 queueing system. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 50:157-174.
 
2
Carlstein. E. 1986. The use of subseries for estimating the variance of a general statistic from a stationary sequence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14:1171-1179.
 
3
Chien, C.-H. 1989. Small sample theory for steady state confidence intervals. Technical Report No. 37, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
 
4
 
5
Conway, R. W. 1963. Some tactical problems in digital simulation. Management Science 10:47-61.
 
6
 
7
Fishman, G. S. 1978a. Grouping observations in digital simulation. Management Science 24:510-521.
 
8
 
9
Fishman, G. S. 1996. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York.
 
10
Fishman, G. S., and L. S. Yarberry. 1994. An implementation of the batch means method. Technical Report UNC/OR/TR/93-1, Department of Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
 
11
 
12
Heyman, D. P., and M. J. Sobel. 1982. Stochastic Models in Operations Research, Volume i. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
 
13
Law, A. M., and J. S. Carson. 1979. A sequential procedure for determining the length of a steadystate simulation. Operations Research 27:1011- 1025.
 
14
 
15
 
16
Schmeiser, B. W. 1982. Batch size effects in the analysis of simulation output. Operations Research 30:556-568.
 
17
 
18
 
19
Song, W.-M. T. 1996. On the estimation of optimal batch sizes in the analysis of simulation output. To appear in European Journal of Operations Research.
 
20
yon Neumann, J. 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference and the variance. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12:367- 395.
21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christos Alexopoulos: colleagues
Andrew F. Seila: colleagues