ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Interface: an evolving concept
Full text PdfPdf (4.33 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 36 ,  Issue 4  (April 1993) table of contents
Special issue on graphical user interfaces
Pages: 110 - 119  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/255950.153585
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bannon, L. Helping users help each other. User centered System Design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1986, pp. 399-410.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Carroll, J.M. Mental models and software human factors. IBM Res. Rep. RC 10616. iBM, Yorktown Heights~ N.Y0, 1984..
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Gould. J.D. Hove to design usable systems. Hamtbook o.f Human-Computer In#rat#on. North-ttolland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 757-789.
 
11
Grudin. J. Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large_ product developnmnt organizations. Human-Compug, Interaction 6, 2 (199.1 ), 147-I96.
 
12
13
14
15
 
16
Irby, C., Bergsteinsson, L., Moran, T., Newman, W, and Tesler, L k methodology for uaer mteEfo, e &sign. OL rice Products Division, Xerox Co r~ ration.
 
17
James, w. The; Principles Psychology. Holt, New York, 1980.
 
18
Liddle, D. What makes a desktop different. In Proceedings oaf Agenda 90, 1989, pp. 69-70.
19
 
20
Moran, T.E '1"he Command language Grammar: A represemation for the use interface of interactive computer systems. Int. J. Man- Machine Stud, ! 5 (198 I), 3-50.
 
21
Newell, A. and Card, S.K. The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human..Comput. Interaction I, 3 (1985), 209-242.
 
22
 
23
Norman, D.A. Cognitive engineering. In t/s~ Centered System Design. Iawrem:e Erlbau:m, Hi.lisdale, N.J,, 1986,
 
24
Noyes, J, The QWERTY keylxmrd: A review. Int. J. Man-Ma,:hi~ Stud. 18 (1983), 265-281.
 
25
Poison, P.G. and Lewis, C.H. Theorybased design tbr easily-learned interfaces. Human-Comput. Interaction 5, 2- 3 (1990), 1.91-220.
 
26
Sayeki, Y. Human interface and cognitive engineerings Inf. Proces,~. 30, l (1989), 2-14,
 
27
Shackel, B. Man-computer interac~ tion~'I'he contribution of the human sciences. Ergonomics 12, 4 (1969), 485-499.
 
28
Smith, D.C., Irby, C~, Kimball, R., Verplank, B. and Harslem, E. Designing the Star user interface. BYTE 7, 4 (19:82),
 
29
 
30
Winek, C.I... 1971 Drug Abu, w Reference. Bek Technical Publications:, Bridgeville, Penn., 1971.
 
31
Wright, K. The road to the global viilag e. Sci. Am. (Mar. 1990), 57-66.
 
32
Young, R+ Surrogates and mappings: Two kinds of conceptual models t'or interactive devices. In Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.., 1983,
 
33

CITED BY  16