Gaining general acceptance for UIMSs

ABSTRACT

User Interface Management Systems (UIMSs) have now gained acceptance in the research and business communities. Unfortunately, they are still not widely available or used. This paper proposes three reasons for this: that they are too hard to use, that they are still too limited in the types of interfaces that they can create, and that they are not portable with respect to different machines, operating systems and graphics systems. UIMSs can be made easier to use by avoiding programming-language-like techniques, and they can be made more functional by providing the ability to create Direct Manipulation interaction techniques and to integrate them into modern interfaces. UIMSs can be made more portable by inventing new input models and graphics packages that are appropriate for highly-interactive interfaces and that can work in various environments.

REFERENCES

• 1: [1] Apple Computer, Inc. Inside Macintosh. Addison-Wesley, 1985.
• 2: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone, Snap-dragging, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.233-240, August 1986
• 3: A. Borning, Defining constraints graphically, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.137-143, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 4: W. Buxton , M. R. Lamb , D. Sherman , K. C. Smith, Towards a comprehensive user interface management system, Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.35-42, July 25-29, 1983, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• 5: W. Buxton , B. Myers, A study in two-handed input, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.321-326, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 6: [6] Gould, L. and Finzer, W. Programming by Rehearsal, Byte 9, 6 (June 1984). Also Technical Report SCL-84-1, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, May, 1984, 133 pages.
• 7: Daniel Conrad Halbert, Programming by example, University of California, Berkeley, 1984
• 8: Philip J. Hayes , Pedro A. Szekely , Richard A. Lerner, Design alternatives for user interface management sytems based on experience with COUSIN, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.169-175, April 1985, San Francisco, California, United States
• 9: D. A. Henderson, Jr., The Trillium user interface design environment, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.221-227, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 10: Ralph D. Hill, Supporting concurrency, communication, and synchronization in human-computer interaction—the Sassafras UIMS, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.3, p.179-210, July 1986 [doi>10.1145/24054.24055]
• 11: [11] Jacob, R. J. K. A State Transition Diagram Language for Visual Programming, IEEE Computer 18, 8 (August 1985), 51-59.
• 12: B. A. Myers, Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: a taxonomy, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.59-66, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 13: Brad A. Myers , William Buxton, Creating highly-interactive and graphical user interfaces by demonstration, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.249-258, August 1986
• 14: [14] Myers, B. A. The Issue of feedback. In preparation.
• 15: Robert P. Nix, Editing by example, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), v.7 n.4, p.600-621, Oct. 1985 [doi>10.1145/4472.4476]
• 16: Dan R Olsen, Jr. , Elizabeth P. Dempsey, SYNGRAPH: A graphical user interface generator, Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.43-50, July 25-29, 1983, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• 17: [17] Olsen, D., Buxton, W., Ehrich, R., Kasik, D., Rhyne, J. and Sibert, J. A Context for User Interface Management, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4, 12, (Dec. 1984), 33-42.
• 18: Dan R. Olsen, Jr. , Elizabeth P. Dempsey , Roy Rogge, Input/output linkage in a user interface management system, Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.191-197, July 1985
• 19: G. E. Pfaff, User Interface Management Systems, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1985
• 20: [20] Schmucker, K. J. MacApp: An Application Framework, Byte, (August 1986), 189-192.
• 21: [21] Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages, IEEE Computer 16, 8 (1983), 57-69.
• 22: John L. Sibert , William D. Hurley , Teresa W. Bleser, An object-oriented user interface management system, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.259-268, August 1986
• 23: [23] Tanner, P. P. and Buxton, W. A. S. Some Issues in Future User Interface Management System (UIMS) Development. In User Interface Management Systems, Pfaff G. R., (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, 67-79.
• 24: James J. Thomas , Griffith Hamlin, Graphical input interaction technique (GIIT), ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.17 n.1, p.5-30, January 1983 [doi>10.1145/988584.988585]

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management