Multi-process structuring of user interface software

ABSTRACT

Many contemporary user interface management systems suffer from the lack of adequate operating system support for multi-process structuring. They either adopt a single-process server approach, resulting in monolithic code, or are implemented as run-time libraries, resulting in a high degree of redundancy and complex synchronization problems. This paper, on the other hand, describes a methodology that takes advantage of lightweight processes and fast interprocess communication to structure user interface software as multiple cooperating processes. It demonstrates that such an approach can lead to exceptional flexibility -- with respect to the addition of new functionality, in particular -- without sacrificing performance.

REFERENCES

• 1: Richard J. Beach , John C. Beatty , Kellogg S. Booth , Darlene A. Plebon , Eugene L. Fiume, The message is the medium: Multiprocess structuring of an interactive paint program, Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.277-287, July 26-30, 1982, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 2: [2] Berglund, E. J. An introduction to the V-System. IEEE Micro, (August 1986), 35-52.
• 3: [3] Booth, K. S., Cowan, W. B. and Forsey, D. R. Multitasking support in a graphics workstation. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Computer Workstations, (November 1985), IEEE, 82-89.
• 4: [4] Brown, M. and Heck, M., Understanding PHIGS: The Hierarchical Graphics Standard. Megatek Corporation, San Diego, CA, 1985.
• 5: J R Dance , T E Granor , R D Hill , S E Hudson , J Meads , B A Myers , A Schulert, The run-time structure of UIMS-supported applications, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.21 n.2, p.97-101, April 1987 [doi>10.1145/24919.24923]
• 6: James D. Foley , Andries Van Dam, Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1982
• 7: James Gosling, SunDew—a distributed and extensible window system, Proceedings of an Alvey Workshop on Methodology of window management, p.47-57, March 1986, Cosener's House, Abingdon, United Kingdom
• 8: Mark Green, The University of Alberta user interface management system, Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.205-213, July 1985
• 9: [9] Green, P. E. Jr. Protocol conversion. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-34, 3, (March, 1986), 257-268.
• 10: [10] Lantz, K. A. An architecture for configurable user interfaces. In Foundation for Human-Computer Communication, K. Hopper and I. A. Newman (eds), North-Holland, 1986. 257-275.
• 11: [11] Lantz, K. A. Command interaction in distributed systems. In Proc. Fall COMPCON, (September 1980). 25-32.
• 12: Keith A. Lantz, An experiment in integrated multimedia conferencing, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637106]
• 13: Keith A Lantz, On user interface reference models, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, v.18 n.2, p.36-42, Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1145/15683.15688]
• 14: [14] Lantz, K. A., Gradischnig, K. D., Feldman, J. A. and Rashid R. F. Rochester's Intelligent Gateway. Computer 15, 10, (October 1982), 54-68.
• 15: K. A. Lantz , W. I. Nowicki, Structured Graphics for Distributed Systems, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.3 n.1, p.23-51, Jan. 1984 [doi>10.1145/357332.357334]
• 16: K. A. Lantz , William I. Nowicki , Marvin M. Theimer, An Empirical Study of Distributed Application Performance, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.10, p.1162-1174, October 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.231864]
• 17: [17] Lantz, K. A., Pallas, J., and Slocum, M. The WA beyond traditional window systems. Internal Memo, Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.
• 18: Keith A. Lantz , Richard F. Rashid, Virtual terminal management in a multiple process environment, Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, p.86-97, December 10-12, 1979, Pacific Grove, California, United States [doi>10.1145/800215.806574]
• 19: K A Lantz , P P Tanner , C Binding , Kuan-Tsae Huang , A Dwelly, Reference models, window systems, and concurrency, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.21 n.2, p.87-97, April 1987 [doi>10.1145/24919.24922]
• 20: William Ian Nowicki, Partitioning of function in a distributed graphics system (computer networks, operating, window), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1985
• 21: [21] Olsen, D., Buxton, W., Ehrich, R., Kasik, D., Rhyne, J. and Sibert, J. A Context for User Interface Management, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4, (Dec. 1984), 33-42.
• 22: G. E. Pfaff, User Interface Management Systems, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 1985
• 23: [23] Rashid, R. F. Threads of a new system. UNIX Review 4, 8, (August 1986), 36-49.
• 24: Robert W. Scheifler , Jim Gettys, The X window system, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.2, p.79-109, April 1986 [doi>10.1145/22949.24053]
• 25: Peter P. Tanner , Stephen A. MacKay , Darlene A. Stewart , Marceli Wein, A multitasking switchboard approach to user interface management, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.241-248, August 1986
• 26: James J. Thomas , Griffith Hamlin, Graphical input interaction technique (GIIT), ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.17 n.1, p.5-30, January 1983 [doi>10.1145/988584.988585]

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: User interfaces

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management