Some thoughts on the packet network architecture

ABSTRACT

Performance control in packet switching networks is one of the remaining areas that are yet to be explored. In this paper we look into the performance problems with two existing network architectures, datagram and virtual circuit. The major problem with the datagram network is lack of effective traffic control; and with the virtual circuit network, the improperly defined network control semantics and mechanisms. We consider that a new network architecture should be investigated in order to provide performance support for diverse applications.

REFERENCES

• 1: [1] James Atkins. Path Control - The Network Layer of System Network Architecture. Computer Network Architecture and Protocols. Plenum Press, 1982, pages 297-326, Chapter 11.
• 2: [2] Dimitri Bertsekas and Robert Gallager. Flow Control. Data Networks. Prentice-Hall, 1986, pages 423-461, Chapter 6.
• 3: R. T. Braden, Towards a transport service for transaction processing applications, RFC Editor, 1985
• 4: [4] Vinton G. Cerf. Packet Communication Technology. Protocols and Techniques for Data Communication Networks. Prentics-Hall, Inc., 1981, pages 1-34, Chapter 1.
• 5: [5] David Clark. Some Thought on the DARPA Internet Architecture. Paper in preparation. 1986.
• 6: D. D. Clark , M. L. Lambert , L. Zhang, NETBLT: A bulk data transfer protocol, RFC Editor, 1987
• 7: [7] A. Danet et al. The French Publick Packet Switching Service: The Transpac Network. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Communications. August, 1976.
• 8: [8] D. Davies. The Control of Congestion in Packet Switching Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-20(6):546-550, June, 1972.
• 9: [9] J. Fraser, D. Bullock, and N. Long. Overall Characteristics of a TASI System. Bell System Technical Journal :1439-1454, July, 1962.
• 10: [10] Mario Gerla and Leonard Kleinrock. Flow Control: A Comparative Survey. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28(4), April, 1980.
• 11: [11] L. Kleinrock. A Decade of Network Development. Journal of Telecommunication Networks, Spring, 1982.
• 12: John Nagle, Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.14 n.4, p.11-17, October 1984 [doi>10.1145/1024908.1024910]
• 13: [13] J . Postel, Carl Sunshine, and Danny Cohen. The Arpa Internet Protocol. Computer Networks 5(1981):261-271, 1981.
• 14: J. Postel, Internet Control Message Protocol, RFC Editor, 1981
• 15: [15] L. Pouzin, editor. The Cyclades Computer Network. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982.
• 16: [16] J. Rinde. TYMNET: An Alternative to Packet Technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Communications, pages 268-273. August, 1976.
• 17: Paul J. Santos, (Comments) on "Congestion Control in IP/TCP Internetworks", ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.15 n.3, p.3-5, July/August 1985 [doi>10.1145/1015621.1015622]
• 18: [18] Jerome Saltzer, David Reed, David Clark. End-to-End Arguments in System Design. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 1981.
• 19: [19] David R. Smith. Operational Evaluation of a Voice Concentrator Over AUTOVON Interswitch Trunks. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-30(4):792-802, April, 1982.
• 20: [20] D. Sproule and F. Mellor. Routing, Flow, and Congestion Control in the Datapac Network. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(4), April, 1981.
• 21: [21] Stuart Wecker. DNA - The Digital Network Architecture. Computer Network Architecture and Protocols. Plenum Press, 1982, pages 249-296, Chapter 10.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Packet-switching networks
  C.4 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Performance attributes

General Terms:
Measurement, Performance