|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
Edmund M. Clarke , Orna Grumberg , David E. Long, Model checking and abstraction, Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.343-354, January 19-22, 1992, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
[doi> 10.1145/143165.143235]
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
COUSOT, P. AND COUSOT, R. 1992b. Abstract interpretation frameworks. J. Logic Comput. 2, 4, 511-547.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Dennis Dams , Rob Gerth , Gert Döhmen , Ronald Herrmann , Peter Kelb , Hergen Pargmann, Model Checking Using Adaptive State and Data Abstraction, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, p.455-467, June 21-23, 1994
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
DAMS, D., GRUMBERG, O., AND GERTH, R. 1993b. Abstract interpretation of reactive systems: Abstractions preserving ACTL*, ECTL* and CTL*. Dept. of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
|
| |
20
|
DAMS, D., GRUMBERG, O., AND GERTH, R. 1995. Abstract interpretation of reactive systems: Preservation of CTL* Logic Group Preprint Series 132, Dept. of Philosophy, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, The Netherlands. May. Also appeared as Computing Science Note 95/16, Dept. of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology.
|
| |
21
|
DAMS, D. R. 1996. Abstract interpretation and partition refinement for model checking. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
GINZBURG, A. 1968. Algebraic Theory of Automata. ACM Monograph Series. Academic Press, New York/London.
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
KELB, P. 1994. Model checking and abstraction: A framework preserving both truth and failure information. Carl yon Ossietzky Univ. of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. Unpublished note.
|
| |
31
|
KELB, P. 1995. Abstraktionstechniken fiir automatische verifikationsmethoden. Ph.D. thesis, Carl yon Ossietzky Univ. of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
|
| |
32
|
KELB, P., DAMS, D., AND GERTH, R. 1995. Efficient symbolic model checking of the full >- calculus using compositional abstractions. Computing Science Rep. 95/31, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Oct.
|
| |
33
|
KOZEN, D. 1983. Results on the propositional #-calculus. Theor. Comput. Sci. 27, 333-354.
|
| |
34
|
KRIPKE, S. 1963. A semantical analysis of modal logic I: Normal modal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift fiir Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9, 67-96.
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
|
| |
38
|
LARSEN, K. G. AND THOMSEN, B. 1988. A modal process logic. In the 1988 IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 203-210.
|
 |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
LOISEAUX, C. 1994. V6rification symbolique de syst~mes r6actifs g l'aide d'abstractions. Ph.D. thesis, Universit6 Joseph Fourier- Grenoble I, Grenoble, France.
|
| |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
|
| |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
MILNER, R. 1971. An algebraic definition of simulation between programs. In the 2nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. British Computer Society, London, U.K., 481-489.
|
| |
45
|
|
| |
46
|
|
| |
47
|
SIFAKIS, J. 1982. Property preserving homomorphisms and a notion of simulation for transition systems. Rapport de Recherche 332, IMAG, Grenoble, France. Nov.
|
| |
48
|
|
| |
49
|
VAN BENTHEM, J., VAN EIJCK, J., AND STEBLETSOVA, V. 1994. Modal logic, transition systems and processes. J. Logic Comput. 4, 5, 811-855.
|
| |
50
|
VARDI, M. Y. AND WOLPER, P. 1986. An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification (preliminary report). In Logic in Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 332-344.
|
CITED BY 49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Hatcliff , Matthew B. Dwyer , Corina S. Păsăreanu , Robby, Foundations of the Bandera abstraction tools, The essence of computation: complexity, analysis, transformation, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constance Heitmeyer , James Kirby, Jr. , Bruce Labaw , Myla Archer , Ramesh Bharadwaj, Using Abstraction and Model Checking to Detect Safety Violations in Requirements Specifications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.24 n.11, p.927-948, November 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kees van Hee , Olivia Oanea , Alexander Serebrenik , Natalia Sidorova , Marc Voorhoeve, LogLogics: A logic for history-dependent business processes, Science of Computer Programming, v.65 n.1, p.30-40, March, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Antonik , Michael Huth , Kim G. Larsen , Ulrik Nyman , Andrzej Wąsowski, EXPTIME-complete Decision Problems for Modal and Mixed Specifications, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), v.242 n.1, p.19-33, July, 2009
|
REVIEW
"Richard John Botting : Reviewer"
The “abstract interpretations” in the title are models
of “concrete” systems that have fewer states than the
original. The abstraction preserves the truth of a requirement expressed
as a formula in a modal logic. Checki
more...
|