ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Delay fault coverage: a realistic metric and an estimation technique for distributed path delay faults
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (65 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California, United States
Pages: 494 - 501  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-8186-7597-7
Authors
Mukund Sivaraman  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Andrzej J. Strojwas  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a new and realistic definition of delay fault coverage, based on the percentage of fabricated faulty chips which can be detected as faulty by a given test set. This metric takes into account the probability distribution of delay fault sizes caused by fabrication process effects, as opposed to previously defined metrics which have been based primarily on the percentage of faults tested. In addition to proposing a realistic delay fault coverage metric, we also present a computationally viable scheme for using this metric to estimate the coverage of any given test set for a class of path delay faults caused by distributed fabrication process variations. We use the results for the ISCAS'89 benchmark circuits to demonstrate wide discrepancies between distributed path delay fault coverage estimates for robust test sets obtained using our realistic definition, and the ones obtained by using the traditional notion of coverage as the percentage of paths tested.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. Kirkpatrick and N. Clark, "PERT as an aid to logic design," IBM, Tech. Rep., 1966.
 
2
3
 
4
G.L. Smith, "Model for delay faults based upon paths," Proc. ITC, Nov. 1985, pp. 324-349.
 
5
C. J. Lin and S. M. Reddy, "On delay fault testing in logic circuits," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided design, vol. 6-5, Sept. 1987, pp. 694-703.
 
6
E. S. Park and M. R. Mercer, "Robust and nonrobust tests for path delay faults in a combinational circuit," Proc. International Test Conf., 1987, pp. 1027-1034.
 
7
 
8
 
9
S.M. Reddy, C. J. Lin and S. Patil, "An automatic test pattern generator for the detection of path delay faults," Proc. Int'l Conf. on CAD, Nov. 1987, pp. 284-287.
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
J. Waicukauski, E. Lindbloom, B. Rosen and V. Iyengar, "Transition fault simulation," IEEE Design and Test of Computers, Vol. 4, No. 2, April 1987, pp, 32-38.
 
16
17
 
18
V. Iyengar, B. Rosen and I. Spillinger, "Delay test generation 1-- Concepts and coverage metrics," Proc. Internaional Test Conf., 1988, pp. 857-866.
 
19
 
20
S. Park, M. R. Mercer and T. W. Williams, "Statistical elay fault coverage and defect level for delay faults," roc. International Test Conf., 1988, pp. 492-499.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mukund Sivaraman: colleagues
Andrzej J. Strojwas: colleagues