ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tearing based automatic abstraction for CTL model checking
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (331 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California, United States
Pages: 76 - 81  
Year of Publication: 1997
ISBN:0-8186-7597-7
Authors
Woohyuk Lee  University of Colorado, ECEN Campus Box 425, Boulder, CO
Abelardo Pardo  University of Colorado, ECEN Campus Box 425, Boulder, CO
Jae-Young Jang  University of Colorado, ECEN Campus Box 425, Boulder, CO
Gary Hachtel  University of Colorado, ECEN Campus Box 425, Boulder, CO
Fabio Somenzi  University of Colorado, ECEN Campus Box 425, Boulder, CO
Sponsors
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present the tearing paradigm as a way to automatically abstract behavior to obtain upper and lower bound approximations of a reactive system. We present algorithms that exploit the bounds to perform conservative ECTL and ACTL model checking. We also give an algorithm for false negative (or false positive) resolution for verification based on a theory of a lattice of approximations. We show that there exists a bipartition of the lattice set based on positive versus negative verification results. Our resolution methods are based on determining a pseudo-optimal shortest path from a given, possibly coarse but tractable approximation, to a nearest point on the contour separating one set of the bipartition from the other.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
H. Cho and F. Somenzi. Sequential logic optimization based on state space decomposition. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Design Automation, pages 200-204, Paris, France, February 1993.
 
5
P. Kelb, D. Dams, and R. Gerth. Practical symbolic model checking of the full /~-calculus using compositional abstractions. Technical Report 95-31, Department of Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1995.
 
6
 
7
 
8
R. Milner. An algebraic definition of simulation between programs. Proc. 2nd Int. Joint Co@ on Artificial Intelligence, pages 481-489, 1971.

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Woohyuk Lee: colleagues
Abelardo Pardo: colleagues
Jae-Young Jang: colleagues
Gary Hachtel: colleagues
Fabio Somenzi: colleagues