ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Elicitations during information retrieval: implications for IR system design
Full text PdfPdf (789 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Zurich, Switzerland
Pages: 120 - 127  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-89791-792-8
Authors
Amanda Spink  School of Library and Information Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Abby Goodrum  School of Library and Information Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX
David Robins  School of Library and Information Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Mei Mei Wu  Associate Professor, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, 106
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/243199.243239
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Allen, B. L. (1988). Text structures and the user-intermediary interaction. RQ, Summer, 535-541.
 
2
Auster, E., & Lawton, S. B. (1984). Search interview techniques and information gain as antecedents of user satisfaction with online retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 90-103.
 
3
Belkin, N. J. (1984). Cognitive models and information transfer. Social Science Information Studies, 4, 111-129.
 
4
Belkin, N. J. (1993). Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In Information Retrieval '93: von der modellierung zur Anwendung. Proceedings of the First Conference of the Gesselschaft fur Informatik Fachgruppe Information Retrieval Regensburg 1993. (Schriften zur information Swissenschaft, Band 12). Konstanz, Universitatsverlag Konstanz.
 
5
 
6
Belkin, N. J., Seeger, T., & Wersig, G. (1983). Distributed expert problem treatment as a model for information system analysis and design. Journal of lnformation Science, 5, 153-167.
 
7
Brooks, H. M. (1986). An intelligent interface for document retrieval systems: Developing the problem description and retrieval strategy components. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Information Studies, The City University, London.
 
8
Cicourel, A. V. (1980). Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure. Discourse Processes, 3, 101-132.
 
9
Crouch, W., & Lucia, J. (1981). Analysis of verbal behaviors in the pre-search interview. Report of the Presearch Interview Project. Syracuse University, N.Y., School of Information Studies (ED 205 184).
 
10
Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. Language inSociety, 5(3), 257-313.
 
11
Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
 
12
Kearsley, G. P. (1976). Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(4), 355-375.
 
13
 
14
Levinson, S. C. (198 I). Some observations on the modeling of dialogue. Discourse Processes, 4, 93-116.
 
15
Mokros, H. B., Mullins, L., & Saracevic, T. (1995). Practice and personhood in professional interaction: Social identities and information needs. Library and Information Science Research, 17, 237-257.
 
16
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
 
17
Saracevic, T., Mokros, H., & Su, L. (1990). Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching: A qualitative analysis. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (pp. 47- 54).
 
18
Saracevic, T., Mokros, H., Su, L., & Spink, A. (1991). Interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching. Proceedings of the 12th National Online Meeting, (pp. 329- 342).
 
19
Saracevic, T., & Su, L. (1989). Modeling and measuring userintermediary-computer interaction in online searching: Design of a study. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 75-80.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Spink, A. (forthcoming). An analysis of interactive feedback during information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
 
23
Spine A., Goodrum, A., & Robins, D. (1995a). Elicitations during mediated online searching. Proceedings of the 58th Conference of the American Society for Information Science, Chicago, October 1995 (pp. 97-102).
 
24
Spink, A., Goodrum, A., & Robins, D. (1995b). Search intermediary elicitations during mediated online searching. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, June 1995 Alberta, Canada (pp. 164-174).
 
25
 
26
Vickery, A. (1985). Question analysis. In N. J. Belkin & A. Vickery (Eds.), Interaction in information systems. England: Cambridge University (pp.20-43).
 
27
Wu, Mei Mei. (1993). Information interaction dialog: A study of patron elicitation in the information retrieval interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick. UMI Order Number 9320541.
 
28
Wu, Mei Mei. (1994). Interactions in information retrieval: Discourse analysis and the identification of an elicitation. Proceedings of ROCLING VII, R.O.C., Computational Linguistics Conference VII, National Tsing Hsu University, 1994 (pp. 223-242).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Amanda Spink: colleagues
Abby Goodrum: colleagues
David Robins: colleagues
Mei Mei Wu: colleagues