Rooms: the use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface

ABSTRACT

A key constraint on the effectiveness of window-based human-computer interfaces is that the display screen is too small for many applications. This results in “window thrashing,” in which the user must expend considerable effort to keep desired windows visible. Rooms is a window manager that overcomes small screen size by exploiting the statistics of window access, dividing the user's workspace into a suite of virtual workspaces with transitions among them. Mechanisms are described for solving the problems of navigation and simultaneous access to separated information that arise from multiple workspaces.

REFERENCES

• 1: BOLT, R.A. The Human Interface. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
• 2: Stuart K. Card , Austin Henderson, Jr., A multiple, virtual-workspace interface to support user task switching, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.53-59, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 3: CARD, S. K., PAVEL, M., AND FARRELL, J. Window-based computer dialogues. In Human- Computer Interaction--Interact '84, B. Shackel, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 239-243.
• 4: CHAN, P. P. Learning considerations in user interface design: The Room model. Tech. Rep. CS-84-16, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1984.
• 5: Peter J. Denning, The working set model for program behavior, Communications of the ACM, v.11 n.5, p.323-333, May 1968 [doi>10.1145/363095.363141]
• 6: Peter J. Denning, Virtual Memory, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.2 n.3, p.153-189, Sept. 1970 [doi>10.1145/356571.356573]
• 7: DENNING, P.J. Working sets past and present. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. SE-6, 1 (Jan. 1980), 66-84.
• 8: DISESSA, A. A principled design for an integrated computational environment. Hum.-Comput. Interaction I, 1 (Jan. 1985), 1-47.
• 9: James Donahue , Jennifer Widom, Whiteboards: a graphical database tool, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.4 n.1, p.24-41, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/5401.5403]
• 10: ENGELBART, D. C., AND ENGLISH, W.K. A research center for augmenting human intellect. In Proceedings o{ the AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, vol. 33 (San Francisco, Calif., Dec. 9-11). AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1968, pp. 395-410.
• 11: S. Feiner , S. Nagy , A. van Dam, An experimental system for creating and presenting interactive graphical documents, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.1 n.1, p.59-77, Jan. 1982 [doi>10.1145/357290.357296]
• 12: S. S. Fisher , M. McGreevy , J. Humphries , W. Robinett, Virtual environment display system, Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on Interactive 3D graphics, p.77-87, January 1987, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/319120.319127]
• 13: G. W. Furnas, Generalized fisheye views, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.16-23, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 14: Adele Goldberg, SMALLTALK-80: the interactive programming environment, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1984
• 15: Frank G. Halasz , Thomas P. Moran , Randall H. Trigg, Notecards in a nutshell, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.45-52, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• 16: Christopher F. Herot, Spatial management of data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.5 n.4, p.493-513, Dec. 1980 [doi>10.1145/320610.320648]
• 17: HURST, J., AND WALKER, K., EDS. The Problem-Oriented System. MEDCOM Press, New York, 1972.
• 18: Kevin Comerford Kahn, Program behavior and load dependent system performance., 1976
• 19: MADISON, A. W. Characteristics of Program Localities. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1982.
• 20: MCGREGOR, S. The viewer window package. In The Cedar System: An Anthology o{ Documentation, J. H. Horning, Ed. Tech. Rep. CSL-83-14, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif., 1983.
• 21: MONT~, L. In Human-Computer Interaction--Interact '84, B. Shackel, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 603-609.
• 22: ROBERTSON, G., NEWELL, A., AND RAMAKRISHNA, K. The ZOG approach to man-machine communication. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 14, 4 (May 1981), 461-488.
• 23: SMITH, D. Pygmalion. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1975.
• 24: SMITH, D. C., IRBY, C., KIMBALL, R., VERPLANK, W., AND HARSLEM, E. Designing the Star user interface. Byte 7, 4 (Apr. 1982), 242-282.
• 25: SPENCE, R., AND APPERLY, S. Data base navigation: An office environment for the professional. Behav. Inf. Technol. 1, 1 (Jan. 1982), 43-54.
• 26: SUTHERLAND, I.S. Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. In AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, vol. 23, 1963, pp. 329-346.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  D. Software
  D.4 OPERATING SYSTEMS
      D.4.2 Storage Management
          Subjects: Virtual memory

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors; Human information processing

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Ergonomics; Interaction techniques

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Theory