| Massively parallel simulations of ATM systems |
| Full text |
Pdf
(701 KB)
|
| Source
|
Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation
archive
Proceedings of the tenth workshop on Parallel and distributed simulation
table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 39 - 46
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-8186-7539-X
Also published in ...
|
|
Authors
|
|
Krishnan Kumaran
|
Department of Physics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ and AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ
|
|
Boris Lubachevsky
|
Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Innovations, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ
|
|
Anwar Elwalid
|
Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Innovations, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
IEEE Computer Society
Washington, DC, USA
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 9, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We simulate models of ATM communication systems on a massively parallel SIMD computer. Fast simulations of ATM models are needed because the regimes of interest usually involve high volumes of traffic and low failure rates. Unexpected practical and theoretical difficulties, partly due to the massive parallelism and SIMD aspects, were encountered and we show how to cope with them. In a replica-parallel simulation of an ATM system, large variations in computed statistics are caused by small differences in the distribution of employed random number generators. A comparison of these distributions using a secondary statistical measure served to disambiguate the results. It was also found that time-parallel simulations of ATM systems with Markov sources can be efficiently performed using parallel prefix methods only when the sources have a small number of states, while more complex sources require end-state matching for efficient simulation. We discovered that, with the proper choice of initial state distributions and partial regeneration points, the time and memory requirements can be much improved. Our simulations were carried out on the MasPar MP-1216 system with 16,384 processors, which was compared against an SGI workstation. We achieved about 60%-70% efficiency (speed-up of approx 35 compared to the ideal of approx 51).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
K. M. Chandy and R. Sherman. Spacetime and simulation. Proceedings of the 1989 SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, pages 53-57, March 1989.
|
| |
2
|
Anwar Elwalid, Debasis Mitra, and Robert H. Wentworth. A new approach for allocating buffers and bandwidth to heterogenous, regulated tramc in an atm node. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(6):1115-1127, Aug. 1995.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Richard M. Fujimoto, C. Anthony Cooper, and Ioanis Nikolaidis. Parallel simulation of statistical multiplexers. 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1993.
|
 |
5
|
Albert G. Greenberg , Boris D. Lubachevsky , Isi Mitrani, Unboundedly parallel simulations via recurrence relations, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMETRICS conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, p.1-12, April 1990, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
|