An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents

Full text

Html (38 KB), Pdf

Pdf (972 KB)

Source

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground table of contents

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Pages: 150 - 156

Year of Publication: 1996

ISBN:0-89791-777-4

Author

Laurent Karsenty

ARAMIIHS, 31 rue des Cosmonautes, Z.I. du Palays, F-31077 Toulouse, France

Sponsor

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 75, Citation Count: 13

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238386.238462 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Liam J. Bannon , Kari Kuutti, Shifting Perspectives on Organizational Memory: From Storage to Active Remembering, Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) Volume 3: Collaboration Systems and Technology, p.156, January 03-06, 1996
	2	Boose, J.H., Bradshaw, J., and Shema D.B. Knowledge-based Design Rationale Capture: Automating Engineering Trade Studies. In: Green M. (Ed.) Knowledge Aided Design, NY: Academic Press, 1992.
	3	Boy, G. Supportability-based design rationale. In Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, 1995.
	4	John M. Carroll, The Nurnberg funnel: designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990
	5	Carroll J.M. and Moran T.P. (Eds.) Human-Computer Interaction, Special Issue on Design Rationale, 6(3&4), 1991.
	6	Jeff Conklin , Michael L. Begeman, gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.4, p.303-331, Oct. 1988 [doi>10.1145/58566.59297]
	7	G. Fischer , R. McCall , A. Morch, Design environments for constructive and argumentative design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Wings for the mind, p.269-275, March 1989
	8	James D. Herbsleb , Eiji Kuwana, Preserving knowledge in design projects: what designers need to know, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.7-14, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/169059.169061]
	9	Karsenty, L., and Br~zillon, P. Cooperative problem solving and explanation. Expert Systems with Application, 8(4), 445-462, 1995.
	10	Mark Klein, Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering Teams, Computer, v.26 n.1, p.39-47, January 1993 [doi>10.1109/2.247650]
	11	Lee J. and Lai K. What's in Design Rationale?. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3&4), 251-280, 1991.
	12	MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Bellotti, V. and Moran T.P., Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3&4), 201-250, 1991.
	13	Simon Buckingham Shum , Nick Hammond, Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.40 n.4, p.603-652, April 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1029]
	14	Loren G. Terveen , Peter G. Selfridge , M. David Long, From “folklore” to “living design memory”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.15-22, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/169059.169062]

CITED BY 13

	Jeff Tyree , Art Akerman, Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture, IEEE Software, v.22 n.2, p.19-27, March 2005
	Carmen Zannier , Frank Maurer, A qualitative empirical evaluation of design decisions, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.30 n.4, July 2005
	Gregory Huet , Stephen J. Culley , Christopher A. McMahon , Clément Fortin, Making sense of engineering design review activities, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, v.21 n.3, p.243-266, June 2007
	Davide Falessi , Martin Becker , Giovanni Cantone, Design decision rationale: experiences and steps ahead towards systematic use, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.31 n.5, September 2006
	Davide Falessi , Giovanni Cantone , Martin Becker, Documenting design decision rationale to improve individual and team design decision making: an experimental evaluation, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on International symposium on empirical software engineering, September 21-22, 2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
	John Horner , Michael E. Atwood, Design rationale: the rationale and the barriers, Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, p.341-350, October 14-18, 2006, Oslo, Norway
	Carmen Zannier , Mike Chiasson , Frank Maurer, A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers, Information and Software Technology, v.49 n.6, p.637-653, June, 2007
	Janet E. Burge , David C. Brown, Software Engineering Using RATionale, Journal of Systems and Software, v.81 n.3, p.395-413, March, 2008
	Davide Falessi , Rafael Capilla , Giovanni Cantone, A value-based approach for documenting design decisions rationale: a replicated experiment, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Sharing and reusing architectural knowledge, May 13-13, 2008, Leipzig, Germany
	Marco Aurisicchio , Marina Gourtovaia , Rob Bracewell , Ken Wallace, How to evaluate reading and interpretation of differently structured engineering design rationales, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, v.22 n.4, p.345-358, November 2008
	Janet e. Burge, Design rationale: Researching under uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, v.22 n.4, p.311-324, November 2008
	Tad Gonsalves , Kiyoshi Itoh, Performance Design Rational Framework, Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, v.11 n.1, p.61-74, January 2007
	Chaker Djaiz , Davy Monticolo , Nada Matta, Capitalization of knowledge from projects, Proceeding of the 2006 conference on Leading the Web in Concurrent Engineering: Next Generation Concurrent Engineering, p.317-324, May 24, 2006