ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Self disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications
Full text HtmlHtml (37 KB),  PdfPdf (1.03 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 3 - 10  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-89791-777-4
Authors
Suzanne Weisband  Department of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Sara Kiesler  HCI Institute & Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 161,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238386.238387
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aiello, J. R. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 499-507.
 
2
American Institutes for Research. (1993, July 30). Increasing the safety of the blood supply by screening donors more effectively. Final Report, Vol I. AIR, 3333 K St. Washington, DC 20007.
3
 
4
Bashore, T. R., & Rapp, P. E. Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures? Psychological Bulletin, 113, 3-22.
 
5
Binik, Y. M., Servan-Schreiber, D., Freiwald, S., & Hall, K. S. (1988). Intelligent computer-based assessment and psychotherapy: An expert system for sexual dysfunction. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 387-400.
 
6
Booth-Kewely, S., Edwards, J. E., & Rosenfeld, P. (1992). Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 562-566.
 
7
Catania, J. A., Gibson, D. R., Chitwood, D. D. & Coates. T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339-362.
 
8
 
9
Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.
 
10
Dindia, K. & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
 
11
 
12
Gaver, W. W. (1986). Auditory icons: Using sound in computer interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 167-177.
 
13
Greist, J. H., Gustafson, D. H., Stauss, F F., Rowse, G. L., Laughren, T. P & Chiles, J. A. (1973). Computer interview for suicide-risk prediction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1327-1332.
14
 
15
Hedges, L V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press
 
16
Itou, K. S., Hayamizu, S. & Tanaka, H. (1992). Continuous speech recognition by context-dependent phonetic HMM and an efficient algorithm for finding N-best sentence hypotheses. Proceedings of ICASSP. IEEE Press.
 
17
Johnson, B. (1989). Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Upgrade documentation, 1993)
 
18
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413.
 
19
Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96-123.
 
20
Kiesler, S., Walsh, J., & Sproull, L. (1992). Computer networks in field research. In F. B. Bryant , J. Edwards, S. Tindale, E. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar, (Eds.), Methodological Issues in Applied Social Research (pp. 239-268). New York: Plenum.
 
21
Koson, D., Kitchen, M., Kochen, M, & Stodolsky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 803-810.
 
22
Locander, W., Sudman, S. & Bradburn, N. (1976). An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 267-275.
 
23
Locke, S. E., Kowaloff, H. B., Hoff, R. G., Safran, C., Popovsky, M. A., Cotton, D. J., Finkelstein, D. M., Page, P. L., & Slack, W. V. (1992). Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV infection. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1301-1305.
 
24
Mead, A. D. & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tsts: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 440-458.
 
25
 
26
Roese, N. J. & Jamieson, D. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363-375.
 
27
Smith, R E. (1963). Examination by computer. Behavioral Science, 8, 76-79.
 
28
Sproull, L., Walker, J., Subramani, R., Kiesler, S., & Waters, K. (in press). When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction.
 
29
Synodinos, N. E., & Brennan, J. M. (1988). Computer interactive interviewing in survey research. Psychology and Marketing, 5, 117-137.
30
 
31
Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status awareness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.
 
32
 
33
Welch, R. B., Blackmon, T. T., Liu, A., Mellers, B. A., & Stark, L. W. (in press). The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators And Virtual Environments.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Suzanne Weisband: colleagues
Sara Kiesler: colleagues