ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Readers' expectations and writers' goals in the late age of print
Full text PdfPdf (1.07 MB)
Source ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on Systems documentation: Marshaling new technological forces: building a corporate, academic, and user-oriented triangle table of contents
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Pages: 257 - 266  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-89-791-799-5
Authors
Charles A. Hill  Department of English, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI
Brad Mehlenbacher  Technical Communication, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Sponsor
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238215.238305
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Bernhardt, S. A. (1986). Seeing the Text. College Composition and Communication, 37 (1), 66-78.
 
3
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reacling in an Electronic Age. Boston, MA: Faber and Faber.
 
4
 
5
Bush, V. (1945). As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly, 76, 101-108.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Chafe, Wallace. (1986). Writing in the Perspective of Speaking. Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. C. R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 12- 39.
 
9
Collins, A. & Genmer, D. (1980). A Framework for a Cognitive Theory of Writing. Cognitive Processes in Writing. L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbamn, 51-72.
 
10
Dipardo, A., & Dipardo, M. (1990). Towards the Metapersonal Essay: Exploring the Potential of Hypertext in the Composition Class. Computers and Composition, 7(3), 7-22.
 
11
Dobrin, D. N. (1994). Second response {to Part of Teaching and Learning with Technology. C. L. Selfe & S. HiUigoss (E~.). NY, NY: MLA, 305- 318.
 
12
Hawisher, G. E. (1987). Research Update: Writing and Word Processing. Computers and Composition, 5 (2), 7-27.
 
13
 
14
Hill, C. A., Wallace, D. L., & Haas, C. (1991). Revising On-Line: Computer Technologies and the Revising Process. Computers and Composition, 9 (1), 83-109.
 
15
Johanyak, M. (1996). Speech, Writing, and Computer-Mediated Discourse 's Placement on the Language Continuum Study of Language Use in a Networked Classroom. Paper presentation. Milwaukee,.WI: College Composition and Communication Conference.
 
16
Johnson, R. R. (1995). Romancing the Hypertext: A Rhetorical/Historiographical ~rlew of the "Hyperphenomenon. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4, 11-22.
 
17
Johnson-Eilola, J. (1994). Overview {to Part III}. Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology. C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss ~.). NY, NY: MLA, 195- 219.
 
18
Joyce, M. (1988). Siren Shapes: Exploratory and Constructive Hypertexts. Academic Computing (Nov.), 10+.
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
23
 
24
Mehlenbacher, B. (in preparation). Docuware: A Framework for the Integration of Digitized Texts and Application Software. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
25
 
26
Moulthrop, S. & Kaplan, N. (1994). They Became What They Beheld: The Futility of Resistance in the Space of Electronic Writing. Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology. C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.). NY, NY: MLA, 220-237.
27
 
28
 
29
Ong, W. (1982). Oratity and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London, England: Methuen.
 
30
Porter, J. E. (1986). Intertex~ty and the Discourse Community. Rhetoric Review, 5 (1), 34-45.
 
31
Redish, J. (1993). Understanding Readers. Techniques for Technical Communicators. C. M. Barnum & S. Carliner (F. xls.). NY, NY: MacMillan P., 14-41.
 
32
 
33
Selber, S. A. (1995). Metaphorical perspectives on hypertext. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38 (2), 59-67.
 
34
Selber, S. A. (1996). Designing Technical Communication Programs: Frameworks for the Computer Age. Interrogating Scholarship in Computers and Composition Panel. Milwaul~e, WI: College Composition and Communication Conference.
35
 
36
Slatin, J. M. (1988). Hypertext: A Way of Incorporating User Feedback into Online Documentation. Text, Context, and Hypertext: Writing With and For the Computer. Barrett, E. (F_xl.). Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 111-129.
 
37
Slatin, J. M. (1990). Reading Hypertext: Order and Coherence in a New Medium. College English, 52, 870-883.
 
38
Smith, C. F. (1994). H~xtual Thinking Literacy and Computers: The Complications of Teaching and Learning with Technology. C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.). NY, NY: MLA, 264- 281.
 
39
Tuman, M. C. (1992). Word Perfect: Literacy in the Computer Age. Pittsburgh, PA: U of Pittsburgh P.
 
40
W~mn, W. (1990). Encoding and Retrieval of Information in Maps and Diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33 (3), 103-107.
 
41
Woolley, B. (1993). Virtual WorMs: A Journey in Hype and Hyperreality. London, England: Penguin.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Charles A. Hill: colleagues
Brad Mehlenbacher: colleagues