ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Database theory in practice: learning from cooperative group projects
Full text PdfPdf (659 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the twenty-seventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 112 - 116  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-89791-757-X
Also published in ...
Authors
Suzanne W. Dietrich  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Arizona State University, BOX 875406, Tempe, AZ
Susan D. Urban  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Arizona State University, BOX 875406, Tempe, AZ
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/236452.236520
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the use of cooperative group learning concepts in support of an undergraduate database management course that emphasizes the theoretical and practical aspects of database application development. The course project is divided into three main phases, involving requirements analysis and conceptual design, relational database mapping and prototyping, and database system implementation using Microsoft Access. The project deliverables are designed so that students not only develop a database implementation, but also evaluate their design in terms of functional dependencies, normal forms, the lossless join property, and the dependency preservation property, thus establishing the need for sound database design principles. Students are required to actively participate in each phase, with students assuming different roles in each phase to allow them to experience different leadership responsibilities. As part of the grading process, students evaluate their own performance as well as the performance of others in the group. This paper describes our experience with the structure and administration of cooperative groups and provides a discussion of the lessons we have learned, including initial observations of the effectiveness of the approach.




Collaborative Colleagues:
Suzanne W. Dietrich: colleagues
Susan D. Urban: colleagues