Why are CASE tools not used?

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Ivan Aaen , Aila Siltanen , Carsten Sørensen , Veil-Pekka Tahvanainen, A Tale of Two Countries: Case Experiences and Expectations, Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Working Conference on The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development, p.61-93, June 14-17, 1992
	2	Rajiv D. Banker , Robert J. Kauffman, Reuse and productivity in integrated computer-aided software engineering: an empirical study, MIS Quarterly, v.15 n.3, p.375-401, Sept. 1991 [doi>10.2307/249649]
	3	Randolph B. Cooper , Robert W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Management Science, v.36 n.2, p.123-139, Feb. 1990 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123]
	4	Fred D. Davis , Richard P. Bagozzi , Paul R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, v.35 n.8, p.982-1003, Aug. 1989 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982]
	5	Robert G. Fichman, Information technology diffusion: a review of empirical research, Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on Information systems, p.195-206, December 1992, Dallas, Texas, United States
	6	Paul N. Finlay , Andrew C. Mitchell, Perceptions of the benefits from the introduction of CASE: an empirical study, MIS Quarterly, v.18 n.4, p.353-370, Dec. 1994 [doi>10.2307/249520]
	7	Joseph F. Hair, Jr. , Rolph E. Anderson , Ronald L. Tatham , William C. Black, Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995
	8	Jon Hartwick , Henri Barki, Explaining the role of user participation in information system use, Management Science, v.40 n.4, p.440-465, April 1994 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440]
	9	Hertel, B.R. Minimizing error variance introduced by missing data routines in survey analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 4 (1976), 459-474.
	10	Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software for the Mind. McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.
	11	Clifford C. Huff, Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.4, p.45-54, April 1992 [doi>10.1145/129852.129856]
	12	Iivari, J. Factors affecting CASE usage. Working paper, Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, 1996 (available from the author).
	13	Chris F. Kemerer, How the Learning Curve Affects CASE Tool Adoption, IEEE Software, v.9 n.3, p.23-28, May 1992 [doi>10.1109/52.136161]
	14	Kusters, RJ. ja Wijers, G.M. On the practical use of CASE-tools: results of a survey, CASE'93. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on CASE (Singapore, 1993), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 2-10.
	15	Henry C. Lucas, Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1981
	16	Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2, 3 (1991 ), 192-222.
	17	Ronald J. Norman , Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals, Communications of the ACM, v.32 n.9, p.1102-1108, Sept. 1989 [doi>10.1145/66451.66458]
	18	Nunally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
	19	Orlikowski, W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MISQ. 17, 3 (1993), 309-340.
	20	Mary B. Prescott , Sue A. Conger, Information technology innovations: a classification by IT locus of impact and research approach, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.26 n.2-3, p.20-41, May/Aug. 1995 [doi>10.1145/217278.217284]
	21	Rai, A. and Howard, G.S. Propagating CASE usage for software development: An empirical investigation of key organizaational correlates. Omega 22, 2 (1994), 133-147.
	22	Ramiller, N. Perceived compatibility of information technology innovations among secondary adopters: Towards reassessment. J. Engineering and Technology Management 11, 1 (1994), 1-23.
	23	Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition. The Free Press, New York, 1995.
	24	Detmar Straub , Moez Limayem , Elena Karahanna-Evaristo, Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing, Management Science, v.41 n.8, p.1328-1342, Aug. 1995 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.41.8.1328]
	25	Judy L. Wynekoop , James A. Senn , Sue A. Conger, The Implementation of Case Tools: An Innovation Diffusion Approach, Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Working Conference on The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development, p.25-41, June 14-17, 1992