ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Efficient routing in optical networks
Full text PdfPdf (559 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 43 ,  Issue 6  (November 1996) table of contents
Pages: 973 - 1001  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Alok Aggarwal  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Amotz Bar-Noy  Tel-Aviv Univ., Tel-Aviv, Israel
Don Coppersmith  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Rajiv Ramaswami  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Baruch Schieber  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Madhu Sudan  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/235809.235812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the problem of dedicating routes to connections in optical networks. In optical networks, the vast bandwidth available in an optical fiber is utilized by partitioning it into several channels, each at a different optical wavelength. A connection between two nodes is assigned a specific wavelength, with the constraint that no two connections sharing a link in the network can be assigned the same wavelength. This paper considers optical networks with and without switches, and different types of routing in these networks. It presents optimal or near-optimal constructions of optical networks in these cases and algorithms for routing connections, specifically permutation routing for the networks constructed here.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
~BARRY, R. A., AND HUMBLET, P.A., 1992. Bounds on the number of wavelengths needed in WDM ~ networks. In LEOS'92 Summer Topical Meeting Digest. pp. 21-22.
 
3
~BARRY, R. A., AND HUMBLET, P.A. 1993. An all-optical non-blocking M x M switchless connector ~with O(X/M log M) wavelengths and without wavelength changers. Electron Lett. 29, 1252-1254.
 
4
~BARRY, R. A., AND HUMBLET, P. A. 1994. On the number of wavelengths and switches in ~all-optical networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 42, 2/3/4, 583-591.
 
5
~BENE~, V. E. 1962. Heuristic remarks and mathematical problems regarding the theory of ~switching systems. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 41, 1201-1247.
6
 
7
~CHEUNG, N. K., Nosu, K., AND WINZER, G. (EDS.) 1990. IEEE JSAC: Special Issue on Dense WDM ~Networks, vol. 8, IEEE, New York.
 
8
 
9
~GREEN, P.E. 1992. Fiber-Optic Networks. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.
 
10
~HALL, P. 1935. On the representatives of subsets. J. London Math. Soc. 10,(1), 26-30.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
~RAMASWAMI, R. 1993. Multi-wavelength lightwave networks for computer communication, IEEE ~ Communications Magazine, 31, 2, 78-88
15

CITED BY  10


REVIEW

"Valerie King : Reviewer"

The authors clearly describe models of optical networks and prove several upper and lower bounds, using a broad range of techniques. They also pose some good open problems. An optical network consists of wavelength routers and endn  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alok Aggarwal: colleagues
Amotz Bar-Noy: colleagues
Don Coppersmith: colleagues
Rajiv Ramaswami: colleagues
Baruch Schieber: colleagues
Madhu Sudan: colleagues