Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions

ABSTRACT

This article concerns the benefits of presenting abstract data in 3D. Two experiments show that motion cues combined with stereo viewing can substantially increase the size of the graph that can be preceived. The first experiment was designed to provide quantitiative measurements of how much more (or less) can be understood in 3D than in 2D. The 3D display used was configured so that the image on the monitor was coupled to the user's actual eye positons (and it was updated in real-time as the user moved) as well as bring in stereo. Thus the effect was like a local “virtual reality” display located in the vicinity of the computer monitor. The results from this study show that head-coupled stereo viewing can increase the size of an abstract graph that can be understood by a factor of three; using stereo alone provided an increase by a factor of 1.6 and head coupling along produced an increase by a factor of 2.2. The second experiment examined a variety of motion cues provided by head-coupled perspective (as in virtual reality displays), head-guided motion and automatic rotation, respectively, both with and without stereo in each case. The results show that structured 3D motion and stereo viewing both help in understanding, but that the kind of motion is not particularly important; all improve performance, and all are more significant than stereo cues. These results provide strong reasons for using advanced 3D graphics for interacting with a large variety of information structures.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kevin W. Arthur , Kellogg S. Booth , Colin Ware, Evaluating 3D task performance for fish tank virtual worlds, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.11 n.3, p.239-265, July 1993 [doi>10.1145/159161.155359]
• 2: BRAUNSTEIN, M.L. 1976. Depth Perception Though Motion. Academic Press, New York.
• 3: BRUNO, N. AND CUTTIN6, J.E. 1988. Minimodularity and the perception of layout. J. Exper. Psychol. General 117, 161-170.
• 4: Stuart K. Card , George G. Robertson , Jock D. Mackinlay, The information visualizer, an information workspace, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.181-186, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108874]
• 5: Michael Deering, High resolution virtual reality, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.26 n.2, p.195-202, July 1992
• 6: EADES, P. AND XUEMIN, L. 1989. How to draw a directed graph. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages. 13-17.
• 7: FAIRCHILD, $. M., POLTROCK, S. E., AND FURNAS, G.W. 1988. SemNet: Three-dimensional graphic representations of large knowledge bases. In Cognitive Science and Its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction. Raymond Guindon, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 201-233.
• 8: GIBSON. E. J., GIBSON, J. J., SMITH, O. W., AND FLOCK, H. 1959. Motional parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. J. Exper. Psychol. 58, 40-51.
• 9: Hideki Koike, The role of another spatial dimension in software visualization, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.11 n.3, p.266-286, July 1993 [doi>10.1145/159161.155370]
• 10: LACK, L.C. 1974. Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics 15, 193-200.
• 11: John Lamping , Ramana Rao, Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space, Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.13-14, November 02-04, 1994, Marina del Rey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/192426.192430]
• 12: LIEBERMAN, H. 1989. A three-dimensional representation for program execution. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages Proceedings (Rome, Oct.), 111-116.
• 13: LIMOGES, S., WAGE, C., AND KNIGHT, W. 1989. Displaying correlations using position, motion, point size or point color. In Graphics Interface Proceedings (London, Ont., June), 262-265.
• 14: MARIANI, J. A. AND LOUGHER, R. 1992. TripleSpace: An experiment in a 3D graphical interface to a binary relational database. Interacting with Computers 4, 2, 147-162.
• 15: PURCELL, D. G. AND STEWART, A. L. 1991. The object detection effect: Configuration enhances perception. Perception and Psychophysics 50, 3, 215-224.
• 16: George G. Robertson , Jock D. Mackinlay , Stuart K. Card, Cone Trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.189-194, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/108844.108883]
• 17: SOLLENBERGER, R. r. AND MILGRAM, P. 1993. The effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task. Hum. Factors 35, 3, 483-500.
• 18: SOLLENBERGER, R. r. AND MILGRAM, P. 1991. A comparative study of rotational and stereoscopic computer graphic depth cues. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA, Sept.), 1452-1456.
• 19: Colin Ware , Kevin Arthur , Kellogg S. Booth, Fish tank virtual reality, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.37-42, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/169059.169066]
• 20: Colin Ware , David Hui , Glenn Franck, Visualizing object oriented software in three dimensions, Proceedings of the 1993 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research: software engineering, October 24-28, 1993, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Ergonomics

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
  I.4 IMAGE PROCESSING AND COMPUTER VISION

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors, Verification

Keywords:
head-coupled display, information visualization, network visualization, stereopsis, virtual reality