ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How many queries are needed to learn?
Full text PdfPdf (600 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 43 ,  Issue 5  (September 1996) table of contents
Pages: 840 - 862  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Lisa Hellerstein  Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt  Hofstra Univ., Hempstead, NY
Vijay Raghavan  Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN
Dawn Wilkins  Univ. of Mississippi, Oxford
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/234752.234755
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate the query complexity of exact learning in the membership and (proper) equivalence query model. We give a complete characterization of concept classes that are learnable with a polynomial number of polynomial sized queries in this model. We give applications of this characterization, including results on learning a natural subclass of DNF formulas, and on learning with membership queries alone. Query complexity has previously been used to prove lower bounds on the time complexity of exact learning. We show a new relationship between query complexity and time complexity in exact learning: If any “honest” class is exactly and properly learnable with polynomial query complexity, but not learnable in polynomial time, then P = NP. In particular, we show that an honest class is exactly polynomial-query learnable if and only if it is learnable using an oracle for &Ggr;p4.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AIZENSTEIN, H., HELLERSTEIN, L., AND PITT, L. 1992. Read-thrice DNF is hard to learn with ~ membership and equivalence queries. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on the ~ Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, pp. 523-532.~
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
ANTHONY, M., BRIGHTWELL, G., AND SHAWE-TAYLOR, J. 1992. On specifying Boolean functions by ~ labelled examples. Tech. Rep. London School of Economics, London, U.K.
 
9
BIOCH, J., AND IBARAKI, t. 1993. Complexity of identification and dualization of positive boolean ~functions. Tech. Rep. RRR 25-93. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, Rutgers, N.J.
10
 
11
BREITBART, Y. 1992. Complexity of the calculation of predicates by finite automata. Ph.D. ~ dissertation. Technion, Haifa, Israel.
 
12
BSHOUTY, N. 1993. Exact learning via the monotone theory. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ~ IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE, New York, 302-311.
13
 
14
ERD6S, P., AND SPENCER, J. 1974. Probabilistic Methods in Combinatotics. Probability and Mathe-matical Statistics A Series of Monographs and Textbooks. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
 
15
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
 
24
MOSHKOV, M. 1983. Conditional tests. Prob. Kibern. (in Russian) 40, 131-170.
25
26
27
 
28
 
29
STOCKMEYER, L. 1985. On approximation algorithms for #P. SIAMJ. Comput. 14, 849-861.
30

CITED BY  21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lisa Hellerstein: colleagues
Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt: colleagues
Vijay Raghavan: colleagues
Dawn Wilkins: colleagues