Software reuse: metrics and models

ABSTRACT

As organizations implement systematic software reuse programs to improve productivity and quality, they must be able to measure their progress and identify the most effective reuse strategies. This is done with reuse metrics and models. In this article we survey metrics and models of software reuse and reusability, and provide a classification structure that will help users select them. Six types of metrics and models are reviewed: cost-benefit models, maturity assessment models, amount of reuse metrics, failure modes models, reusability assessment models, and reuse library metrics.

REFERENCES

• 1: William W. Agresti , William M. Evanco, Projecting Software Defects from Analyzing Ada Designs, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.18 n.11, p.988-997, November 1992 [doi>10.1109/32.177368]
• 2: B. Barnes , T. Durek , J. Gaffney , A. Pyster, A framework and economic foundation for software reuse, Software reuse: emerging technology, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1988
• 3: Bruce H. Barnes , Terry B. Bollinger, Making Reuse Cost-Effective, IEEE Software, v.8 n.1, p.13-24, January 1991 [doi>10.1109/52.62928]
• 4: V. R. Basili , H. D. Rombach , J. Bailey , A. Delis, Ada reusability and measurement, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD, 1990
• 5: James M. Bieman, Deriving Measures of Software Reuse in Object Oriented Systems, Proceedings of the BCS-FACS Workshop on Formal Aspects of Measurement, p.63-83, May 05, 1991
• 6: BIEMAN, J. AND KARUNANITHI, S. 1993. Candi date reuse metrics for object-oriented and Ada software. In Proceedings of IEEE-CS First International Software Metrics Symposium.
• 7: BIGGERSTAFF, T. 1992. An assessment and analysis of software reuse. In Advances in Computers, Marshall Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, New York.
• 8: Grady Booch, Software Component with ADA, Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1987
• 9: James C. Browne , John Werth , Taejae Lee, Experimental Evaluation of a Reusability-Oriented Parallel Programming Environment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.16 n.2, p.111-120, February 1990 [doi>10.1109/32.44375]
• 10: CARD, D., MCGARRY, F., PAGE, G., ET AL. 1982. The software engineering laboratory. NASA/ GSFC, 2.
• 11: D N Card , V E Church , W W Agresti, An empirical study of software design practices, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.12 n.2, p.264-271, Feb. 1986
• 12: Deng-Jyi Chen , P. J. Lee, On the study of software reuse using reusable C++ components, Journal of Systems and Software, v.20 n.1, p.19-36, Jan. 1993 [doi>10.1016/0164-1212(93)90046-Z]
• 13: S. R. Chidamber , C. F. Kemerer, A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.6, p.476-493, June 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.295895]
• 14: DAVIS, T. 1993. The reuse capability model: a basis for improving an organization's reuse capability. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Reusability (Herndon, VA).
• 15: Michael F. Dunn , John C. Knight, Software reuse in an industrial setting: a case study, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, p.329-338, May 13-17, 1991, Austin, Texas, United States
• 16: John Favaro, What price reusability?: a case study, ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, v.XI n.3, p.115-124, Spring 1991
• 17: Norman E. Fenton, Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach, Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, UK, 1991
• 18: FRAKES, W. 1993. Software reuse as industrial experiment. Am. Program. (Sept.), 27-33.
• 19: William B. Frakes , Ted J. Biggerstaff , Ruben Prieto-Diaz , Kazuo Matsumura , Wilhelm Schaefer, Software reuse: is it delivering?, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, p.52-59, May 13-17, 1991, Austin, Texas, United States
• 20: FRAKES, W. 1990. An empirical framework for software reuse research. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Tools and Methods for Reuse (Syracuse, NY).
• 21: William B. Frakes , Christopher J. Fox, Modeling reuse across the software life cycle, Journal of Systems and Software, v.30 n.3, p.295-301, Sept. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0164-1212(94)00139-E]
• 22: William B. Frakes , Christopher J. Fox, Quality Improvement Using A Software Reuse Failure Modes Model, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.22 n.4, p.274-279, April 1996 [doi>10.1109/32.491652]
• 23: W. B. Frakes , P. B. Gandel, Representing reusable software, Information and Software Technology, v.32 n.10, p.653-664, Dec. 1990 [doi>10.1016/0950-5849(90)90098-C]
• 24: William B. Frakes , Sadahiro Isoda, Success Factors of Systematic Reuse, IEEE Software, v.11 n.5, p.14-19, September 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.311045]
• 25: FRAKES, W.B. AND NEJMEH, B.A. 1987. Software reuse through information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Kona, Jan., 530-535.
• 26: W. B. Frakes , T. P. Pole, An Empirical Study of Representation Methods for Reusable Software Components, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.8, p.617-630, August 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.310671]
• 27: FRAKES, W. AND TERRY, C. 1994. Reuse level metrics. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Reuse (Rio de Janeiro), W. Frakes, Ed., IEEE Computer Science Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 139-148.
• 28: J. E. Gaffney , T. A. Durek, Software reuse—key to enhanced productivity: some quantitative models, Information and Software Technology, v.31 n.5, p.258-267, June 1989 [doi>10.1016/0950-5849(89)90005-0]
• 29: Watts S. Humphrey, Managing the software process, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1989
• 30: David H. Hutchens , Victor R. Basili, System structure analysis: clustering with data bindings, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.8, p.749-757, Aug. 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.232524]
• 31: JONES, C. 1993. Software return on investment preliminary analysis. Software Productivity Research, Inc.
• 32: KOLTUN, P. AND HUDSON, A. 1991. A reuse maturity model. In Fourth Annual Workshop on Software Reuse (Herndon, VA).
• 33: LILLIE. 1995. Personal communication.
• 34: MARGONO, T. AND RHOADS, T. 1993. Software reuse economics: cost-benefit analysis on a large-scale Ada project. In International Conference on Software Engineering ACM, New York.
• 35: John D. McGregor , David A. Sykes, Object-Oriented Software Development: Engineering Software for Reuse, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY, 1992
• 36: OGUSH, M. 1992. A software reuse lexicon. Crosstalk (Dec.).
• 37: Jeffrey S. Poulin , Joseph M. Caruso , Debera R. Hancock, The business case for software reuse, IBM Systems Journal, v.32 n.4, p.567-594, October 1993
• 38: Rubén Prieto-Díaz, Status Report: Software Reusability, IEEE Software, v.10 n.3, p.61-66, May 1993 [doi>10.1109/52.210605]
• 39: R. W. Selby, Quantitative studies of software reuse, Software reusability: vol. 2, applications and experience, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1989 [doi>10.1145/75722.75733]
• 40: TERRY, C. 1993. Analysis and implementation of software reuse measurement. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Master's Project and Report.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.0 General
          Subjects: Economics
      K.6.4 System Management
          Subjects: Quality assurance

General Terms:
Design, Economics, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
cost-benefit analysis, definitions, economics, maturity assessment, models, object-oriented, productivity, quality, reusability, reusability assessment, reuse, reuse level, reuse library metrics, software, software reuse failure modes model