ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating ethical decision making and computer use
Full text PdfPdf (280 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 39 ,  Issue 7  (July 1996) table of contents
Pages: 74 - 83  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Karen D. Loch  Georgia State Univ., Atlanta
Sue Conger  Southern Methodist Univ., Dallas, TX
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 223,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/233977.233999
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84, 5 (1977), 888-918.
 
2
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., Eds. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
 
3
Beck, L. and Ajzen, I. Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J. of Research in Personality 25, 3 (1991), 285-301.
 
4
Betts, M. Privacy key to public trust in health care reform. Computerworld (Nov. 22, 1993), 63.
 
5
Branscomb, A.W. Property rights in information. In B.R. Guide, Ed. Information Technology and Social Transformation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1985.
 
6
Conger, S.A., Loch, K.D., and Helft, B.L. Ethics and information technology use: A factor analysis of attitudes to computer use. Info. 5~yst. J. 5, (1995), 161-184.
 
7
Culnan, M. How did you get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. Manag. Info. 5~st. Q. 17, 3 (Oct. 1993).
 
8
Daly, J. Out to get you. Computerworld (Mar. 12, 1993), 77-79.
 
9
Donaldson, T., and Dunfee, T.W. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Manag. Rev. 19, 2 (1994), 252-284.
 
10
Dyson, E. If nothing on e-mail is private, just say so. Computerworld (Feb. 7, 1993), 33.
 
11
Gibson, A.M. An Empirical Investigation into Ethical Decision- Making in Accounting. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, 1992.
 
12
Gutek, B.A., Winter, S.J., and Chudoba, K.M. Attitudes Toward Computers: When Do They Predict Computer Use? Working paper, University of Arizona, 1992.
 
13
Hegarty, W.H., and Sims, J. Organizational philosophy, policy, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. J. Applied Psych. 64, 3 (1979), 331-338.
 
14
Johnson, D.G. A framework for thinking about computer ethics. InJ. Robinett and R. Barqhin, Eds. Computer and Ethics: A Sourcebook for Discussions. Polytechnic Press, NY, 1989, 26-31.
 
15
 
16
Mason, R.O. Four ethical issues for the 1990s. MIS Q. 10, 1 (1986), 5-14.
 
17
Randall, D.M. Taking stock: Can the theory of reasoned action explain unethical conduct? J. Business Ethics 8, (1989), 873-882.
 
18
Randall, D.M., and Gibson, A.M. Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. J. Business Research 9, (1990), 457-471.
 
19
Robertson, D.C. Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. J. Business Ethics 12, (1993), 585-599.
 
20
 
21
Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Connections. MIT Press, Boston, Mass., 1991.
 
22
Victor, B. and Cullen, J.B. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Q. 33, 3 (1988), 101-125.
 
23
Williams, S.W., Ogletree, S.M., Woodburne, W., and Raffeld, P. Gender roles, computer attitudes and dyadic computer interaction: Performance in college students. Sex Roles: A Jourhal of Research 29, 7-8 (1994), 515-526.
 
24
Wilson, D.T., Mathews, H.L., and Harvey, J.W. An empirical test of the Fishbein Behavioral Intention Model. J. Consumer Research 5, 3 (1975), 365-371.
 
25
Zimbardo, P.G. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. Levine, Ed., Nebraska 5~mposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1969, 237-307.

CITED BY  18


REVIEW

"Doris Keefe Lidtke : Reviewer"

A new approach to analyzing the factors that influence ethical decision making in the computing field is presented in this interesting and well-written paper. The authors have analyzed the literature on ethical decision making. They argue that  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Karen D. Loch: colleagues
Sue Conger: colleagues