ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Non-repudiation with mandatory proof of receipt
Full text PdfPdf (708 KB)
Source ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 26 ,  Issue 1  (January 1996) table of contents
Pages: 6 - 17  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0146-4833
Authors
Tom Coffey  University of Limerick, Ireland
Puneet Saidha  University of Limerick, Ireland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/232335.232338
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Non-repudiation allows an exchange of data between two principals in such a manner that the principals cannot subsequently deny their participation in the exchange. Current non-repudiation schemes, while providing a mandatory proof of origin service, generally provide only discretionary proof of receipt since it is difficult to enforce the return of the proof of receipt by the recipient.In this paper a new scheme for achieving mandatory mutual non-repudiation is proposed, encompassing both mandatory proof of origin and mandatory proof of receipt. The fundamental feature of the scheme is that the proofs of origin and receipt are not exchanged until both principals have submitted their digitally signed evidence to a trusted third party intermediary. This ensures that if the non-repudiation protocol is not completed, neither principal can gain from the exchange. An added advantage is that the process of dispute arbitration is considerably simplified since a small number of rules are required to decide whether an alleged data exchange took place.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[Barb91] Barbut, Jean-Louis, ETEBAC 5: The standard for secure data exchange between banks and their corporate customers. SECURICOM'91, 9th Worldwide Congress on Computer and Communications Security and Protection, (March 1991), 199- 214.
 
2
[CCITT88] CCITT. The directory - authentication framework. CCITT Rec. X.509, (1988).
 
3
[CS95] Coffey, T. and Saidha, P. A logical verification of a non-repudiation protocol. Report #67/95, Department of Electronics & Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland, (1995).
 
4
[DH76] Diffe, W. and Hellman, M. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. IT-22, No. 6, (Nov. 1976), 644-654.
 
5
[GGKL89] Gasser, M., Goldstein, A., Kaufman, C. and Lampson, B. The Digital distributed system security architecture, 1989 National Computer Security Conference, (1989).
 
6
 
7
[ISO89] ISO. Information processing systems - open systems interconnection - basic reference model - part 2: security architecture, ISO 7498-1, (1989).
 
8
[KBN88] Karp, B.C., Barker, L.K. and Nelson, L.D. The secure data network system, AT&T Technical Journal, (May/June 1988), 19-27.
 
9
[Linn91] Linn, J. Privacy-enhanced electronic mail: from architecture to implementation, Information Security, (1991), 233-243.
 
10

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tom Coffey: colleagues
Puneet Saidha: colleagues