ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Challenges in feature-based manufacturing research
Full text PdfPdf (321 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 39 ,  Issue 2  (February 1996) table of contents
Pages: 77 - 85  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Martti Mäntylä  Helsinki University of Technology, Otakaari 1A, SF-02150, Espoo 15, Finland
Dana Nau  Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Jami Shah  Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/230798.230808
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Boothroyd, G. Product design for manufacture and assembly. Comput.-Aided Des. 26, 7 (July 1994), 505-520.
 
2
Bourne, D., and Wang, C. Design and manufacturing of sheet metal parts: Using features to resolve manufacturability problems. In Computers in Engineering 1995, A. Busnaina, Ed. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New York, 1995, pp. 745-753.
 
3
Bronsvoort, W., and Jansen, F. Multi-view feature modeling for design and assembly. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 315-329.
 
4
Chang, T. Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing, Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.
 
5
Chen, R., Navin-Chandra, D., and Prinz, F. A cost-benefit analysis model of product design for recyclability and its application. IEEE Trans. Manuf Technol. (part A) 17, 4, (Dec. 1994), 67-87.
 
6
Das, D., Gupta, S., and Nau, D. Generating redesign suggestions to reduce setup cost: a step towards automated redesign. Comput.-Aided Des., forthcoming.
 
7
E1Maraghy, H., and E1Maraghy, W. Computer-aided inspection planning (CAIP). In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 363-396.
 
8
Geelink, R., Salomons, O., van Slooten, F., van Houten, F., and Kals, H. In A. Busnaina, Ed., Computers in Engineering 1995, Unified feature definition for feature based design and feature based manufacturing. ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 517-533.
 
9
 
10
Gupta, S., Nau, D., Regli, W., and Zhang, G. A methodology for systematic generation and evaluation of alternative operation plans. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 161-184.
 
11
 
12
Juster, N., Hsu, L., and de Pennington, A. The selection of surfaces for inspection planning. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 333-362.
 
13
Kambhampati, S., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, J., and Lee, S. Integrating general purpose planners and specialized reasoners: Case study of a hybrid planning architecture. 1EEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 23, 6 (Nov./Dec. 1993).
 
14
 
15
M/intyl/i, M., Opas, J., and Puhakka, J. Generative process planning of prismatic parts by feature relaxation, in Proc. of 15th ASME Design Automation Conference, B. Ravani, Ed., Montreal, Sept. 17-21, ASME, NewYork, 1989, pp. 49-60.
 
16
Owen, J. STEP--An Introduction. Information Geometers, Winchester, England, 1993.
 
17
Sakurai, H., and Chin, C. Definition and recognition of volume features for process planning. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 65-80.
 
18
 
19
Shah, J.J., Shen, Y., and Shirur, A. Determination of machining volumes from extensible sets of design features. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 129-157.
 
20
Srikantappa, A., and Crawford, R. Automatic part coding based on interfeature relationships. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 215-237.
 
21
Sturgill, M., Cohen, E., and Riesenfeld, F. Feature-based 3-D sketching for early stage design. In Computers in Engineering 1995, A. Busnaina, Ed., ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 545-552.
 
22
 
23
Wozny, M., Pratt, M., and Poli, C. Topics in feature-based design and manufacturing. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 481-510.
 
24
Yue, Y., and Murray, J. Workpiece selection and clamping of complex 2.5D components. In Advances in Feature Based Manufacturing, J. Shah, M. M/intyl/i, and D. Nau, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 185-214.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Martti Mäntylä: colleagues
Dana Nau: colleagues
Jami Shah: colleagues