Taking “computer literacy” literally

ABSTRACT

Computer literacy implies an analogy between computer-related skills and linguistic literacy that has not been seriously explored. Recent studies of linguistic literacy can illuminate the definition of computer literacy and can suggest new ways of teaching it.

REFERENCES

• 1: Akmajian, A.. Demers, R.A., and Harnish, R.M. Linguistics: An fntroduction to Language and Communication. 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge. Mass., 1984.
• 2: Barger, R.N. Computer literacy: Toward a clearer definition. T.H.E. 1. II, 2 (Oct. 1983), 108-112.
• 3: Jon Bentley , Don Knuth , Doug McIlroy, Programming pearls: a literate program, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.6, p.471-483, June 1986 [doi>10.1145/5948.315654]
• 4: Berlin, J.A. Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical issues. Coil. Engl. 44, 8 (Dec. 1982), 765-777. Berlin offers a refinement of one of the most significant conclusions of modern composition theory: that writing is better taught as a process rather than a product.
• 5: Brandt, D. Versions of literacy. Coil. Engl. 47, 2 (Feb. 1985), 126-136. Brandt reviews several recent works on literacy. summarizing and commenting on the major issues.
• 6: Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A.. and Rosen, H. The Development of Writing Abilities (11-18). Macmillan Education, London, 1975. An extended study of various methods of teaching writing as they affect the development of students' writing skills is reported; the authors conclude, in part, that "transactional" writing should be supplemented by "expressive" assignments.
• 7: Compaine. B.M. The new literacy. Daedalus 112, 1 (Winter 1963), 129-142. Appearing in an issue of Daedalus devoted to "Reading, Old and New," this essay argues that computer literacy has become a functional necessity.
• 8: Copperman. P. The Literacy Hoax: The Decline of Reading, Writing, and Learning in the Public Schools and What We Can Do about It. Morrow Quill Paperbacks, New York, 1960.
• 9: Deringer, D.K.. and Molnar, A.R. Key components for a national computer literacy program. In Computer Literacy: issues and Directions for 1985, R.J. Seidel, R.E. Anderson, and B. Hunter, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 1982. pp. 3-7. This volume presents essays and responses from the National Computer Literacy Goals for 1985 Conference held at Reston, Virginia, December 18-20, 1960. The conference did not address college-level computing courses, but several presentations concern the definition and goals of computer literacy in general.
• 10: Ellis Horowitz, Programming languages: a grand tour, Computer Science Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1983
• 11: Kemeny, J.G. The case for computer literacy. Daedalus 112, 2 (Spring 1983), 211-230.
• 12: Rob Kling, Value conflicts in the deployment of computing applications, Proceedings of the ACM 12th annual computer science conference on SIGCSE symposium, p.67-84, February 14-16, 1984, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/800014.808143]
• 13: Donald E. Knuth, Structured Programming with go to Statements, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.6 n.4, p.261-301, Dec. 1974 [doi>10.1145/356635.356640]
• 14: Lindemann, E. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. Oxford University Press, New York, 1962. A practical guide for new teachers of composition.
• 15: Daniel D. McCracken, A skeptical view of computer literacy, Proceedings of the ACM 12th annual computer science conference on SIGCSE symposium, p.61-65, February 14-16, 1984, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/800014.808142]
• 16: Abbe Mowshowitz, Computers and the myth of neutrality, Proceedings of the ACM 12th annual computer science conference on SIGCSE symposium, p.85-92, February 14-16, 1984, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/800014.808144]
• 17: Murray, D.M. Writing and teaching for surprise. Coil. Engl. 46, 1 (Jan. 1984), l-7.
• 18: Peter Naur, Programming languages, natural languages, and mathematics, Communications of the ACM, v.18 n.12, p.676-683, Dec. 1975 [doi>10.1145/361227.361229]
• 19: Noble, D. The underside of computer literacy. Raritan 3.4 {Spring 1984), 37-64. According to Noble, "the practical claims for computer literacy are nonsense," but "the cry for computer literacy is nothing if not a good way to sell computers."
• 20: Ong, W.J. Orality and Likmcy: The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen. New York, 1982. Ong studies the effects of widespread literacy on our use of language and our thinking.
• 21: Seymour Papert, Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1980
• 22: Papert, S. NPW York Times 134, 46458 (July 2, 1985). C7.
• 23: Pattison. R. On Lifemy: The Politics of the Word from Homer to the Age of Rock. Oxford University Press, New York, 1982. Pattison argues that the political orientation of a culture determines the nature and effects of literacy in that culture.
• 24: Pickert. SM.. and Hunter, B. Redefining "literacy." Momentum 14, 3 (Sept. 1983). 7-9. Pickert and Hunter are among the few authors to take seriously the implied analogy between traditional literacy and computing. They focus on the computer's ability to enhance reading and writing skills, rather than on the way traditional literacy can illuminate the teaching of computing.
• 25: Schneider. B.R. Programs as essays. Datamation 30, 10 (May 15, 19851, 162-168. Schneider makes some excellent points about the similarities between structuring programs and structuring essays, and about the need for clear communication in computer documentation.
• 26: Street, B.V. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Vol. 9, Cambridge Studies in Oral and Literate Culture. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984. Street makes a powerful case, based on studies of many cultures, for an "ideological" rather than an "autonomous" model of literacy.
• 27: Watt, D.H. Education for citizenship in a computer-based society. In Computer Literacy: Issues and Directions for 1985, R.J. Seidel, R.E. Anderson, and B. Hunter, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 1982. pp. 53-68. In addition to presenting an excellent summary of definitions of computer literacy, Watt advocates a definition that goes beyond functional skills.
• 28: Weizenbaum. J. Two minutes with Mr. Chips {interview} Boston Mag. 77, 5 (May 1985), 27. Weizenbaum's critique of computer literacy urges that we give priority to traditional forms of literacy, in which students are inexcusably deficient.
• 29: Wilkes, M.V. Past, present and future of the computer field. ZEEE Proceedings 131, part E, 4 (July 1984). 106-112.
• 30: Winter, D.G.. McClelland, D.C., and Stewart, A.J. A Neu Case for the Liberal Arts: Assessing Institutional Goals and Student Devclopmenf. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1981. The authors' review of the functions of a liberal education substantiates my arguments concerning the appropriate functions of computer literacy.
• 31: Winterowd, W.R., Ed. Confemporary Rhetoric: A Conceptual Background with Readings. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. New York, 1975. A valuable collection of essays by specialists in the teaching of composition. Much of the section on invention is relevant to the teaching of programming.
• 32: Wirth. N. Data structures and algorithms. Sri. Am. 251, 3 (Sept. 1984). 60-69. This contribution to an issue on software introduces the educated layperson to the fundamentals of programming, with an emphasis on the solving of well-defined problems.

INDEX TERMS

Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education
      K.3.m Miscellaneous
          Subjects: Computer literacy**

General Terms:
Human Factors, Languages, Standardization