ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The keybowl: an ergonomically designed document processing device
Full text PdfPdf (870 KB)
Source ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility archive
Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Assistive technologies table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 86 - 93  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISBN:0-89791-776-6
Authors
Peter J. McAlindon  University of Central Florida, Department of Industrial Engineering, Orlando, Florida
Kay M. Stanney  University of Central Florida, Department of Industrial Engineering, Orlando, Florida
Sponsor
SIGCAPH: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/228347.228362
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bergqvist, U., Wolgast, E., Nilsson, B., and Voss, M. (1995). Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, ~md work organizational factors. Ergonomics, 38(4), 763- 776.
 
2
Brunet, H., & Richardson, R. M. (1984). Effects of keyboard design and typing skill on user keyboard preferences and throughput performance Proceedings o__f the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 267-271.
3
 
4
Cakir, A. (1995). Acceptance of the adjustable keyboard. Ergonomics, 3__88(9), 1728-1744.
 
5
Carter, J. B., and Banister, E. W. (1994). Musculoskeletal problems in VI3T work: a review. Ergonomics, 37(10), 1623-1648.
 
6
Chen, S., Burastero, S., Tittiranonda, P., Hollerbach, K., Shih, M., and Denhoy, R. (1994). Quantitative evaluation of 4 computer keyboards' Wrist posture and typing performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 38th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1094-1097.
 
7
Cone, E. (1994, June). Keyboard injuries: Who should pay? Information Week, pp. 30-36.
 
8
Fathallah, F. (1988). An exp_ erimentaLcomparisonof a ternary chord keyboard with the OWERTY keyboard. Unpublished masters thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
 
9
Gerard, M. J., Jones, S. K., Smith, L. A., Thomas, R. E., and Wang, T. (1994). An ergonomic evaluation of the Kinesis ergonomic computer keyboard. Erwonomics, 3_27(10), 1661 - 1668.
 
10
Hedge, A., McCrobie, D., Land, B., Morimoto, S., and Rodriquez, S. (1995). Healthy keyboarding: Effects of wrist rests, keyboard trays, and a preset tiltdown system on wrist posture, seated posture, and musculoskeletal discomfort. _Procee.din2s of the. Hum..an Factors Society 39th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 630-634.
11
 
12
Hobday, S. W. (1988). A keyboard to increase productivity and reduce postural stress. In F. Aghazadeh (Ed.), Trends in Ergonomics/I-Ium~ Factors V_.. New York: North-Holland. 321-330.
 
13
Kilbom, A. (1994). Repetitive work of the upper extremity: Part 1- guidelines for the practitioner. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1..44, 51- 57.
 
14
Kroemer, K. H. E. (1992). Use and research issues of a new computer keyboard. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human l~actors Society, 272-275.
 
15
Leavitt, S. B., and Taslitz, N. J. (1993). Designing Healthier Computerized Offices. Computer-related injuries: Legal and desi~n issues. 1-5.
 
16
Martin, M.G.(1993). Of mice and pens: Low risk healthy postures for modern computing. In M. J. Smith and G. Salvendy (Eds.), Advances in Human _Factors/Ergonomics. 19B Human-Computer Ingeraction. Elsevier. 791-796.
 
17
McAlindon, P., Stanney, K., and Silver, N.C. (1995). A comparative analysis of typing errors between the Keybowl and the QWERTY keyboard. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 39th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 635-639.
 
18
McMulkin, M. L., and Kroemer, K. H. E. (1994). Usability of a one-hand ternary chord keyboard. Ergonomics, 25(3), 177-181.
 
19
Morelli, D. L., Johnson, P. W., Reddell, C. R., and Lau P. (1995). User preferences between keyboards while performing "real" work: A comparison of "alternative" and standard keyboards, lhroceedin~s of the Human }Factors Socie~ 39th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 361-365.
 
20
Nakaseko, M., Grandjean, E., Hunting, W., and Gierer, R. (1985). Studies on ergonomically designed alphanumeric keyboards. Human Factors, 2_27(2), 175- 187.
 
21
Norman, D. A. & Fisher, D. (1982). Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: Keyboard layout doesn't much matter. Human Factors, 24(5), 509-519.
 
22
Noyes, J. (t983). The QWERTY keyboard: A review. Inter/rational Journal of Man,Machine Studies, 18, 265-281.
 
23
Schoenmarklin, R. W., Marras, W. S., and Leurgans, S. E. (1994). Industrial wrist motions and incidence of hand/wrist cumulative trauma disorders. Ereonomics. 37(9), 1449-1459.
 
24
Shiratori, Y. & Obashi, F. (1986). Optimum keyboard layout design and evaluation of its operation. Contcmporory Ergonomics, Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
 
25
Smutz, P., Serina, E., and Rempel, D. (1994). A system for evaluating the effect of keyboard design on force, posture, comfort, and productivity. Ereonomics, 37(10), 1649-1660.
 
26
Walker, N., Meyer, D. E., Smelcer, J. B. (1993). Spatial and temporal characteristics of rapid cursorpositioning movements with electromechanical mice in human-computer interaction. Human Factors, 35(3), 431-458.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter J. McAlindon: colleagues
Kay M. Stanney: colleagues