ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating software engineering methods and tool—part 2: selecting an appropriate evaluation method—technical criteria
Full text PdfPdf (488 KB)
Source ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 2  (March 1996) table of contents
Pages: 11 - 15  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0163-5948
Author
Barbara Ann Kitchenham  NCC Services Ltd, National Computing Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M1 7ED, England
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 81,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/227531.227533
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the previous article about the DESMET evaluation methodology, I identified nine different types of evaluation:1. Quantitative Experiments2. Quantitative Case Studies3. Quantitative Surveys4. Feature Analysis---Screening mode5. Feature Analysis---Case Study6. Feature Analysis---Experiment7. Feature Analysis---Survey8. Qualitative Effects Analysis9. Benchmarking.This article considers the way in which different evaluation requirements and organisation capabilities affect your choice of evaluation method. Your particular choice of evaluation method will be affected by your evaluation goals, the characteristics of the object you want to evaluate, the characteristics of the organisation you work in, and the limitations and constraints placed on the evaluation exercise. These different factors interact in complicated ways, so it is difficult to identify which evaluation method is the most appropriate.The specific criteria that the DESMET methodology uses to determine your circumstances are:1. The evaluation context.2. The nature of the expected impact of using the method/tool.3. The nature of the object (i.e., method/tool/generic method) to be evaluated.4. The scope of impact of the method/tool.5. The maturity of the method/tool.6. The learning curve associated with the method/tool.7. The measurement capability of the organisation undertaking the evaluation.These issues are discussed in the following sections.



Collaborative Colleagues:
Barbara Ann Kitchenham: colleagues