ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Language support for the specification and development of composite systems
Full text PdfPdf (2.82 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) archive
Volume 9 ,  Issue 2  (April 1987) table of contents
Pages: 198 - 234  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISSN:0164-0925
Author
Martin S. Feather  USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/22719.22947
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

When a complex system is to be realized as a combination of interacting components, development of those components should commence from a specification of the behavior required of the composite system. A separate specification should be used to describe the decomposition of that system into components. The first phase of implementation from a specification in this style is the derivation of the individual component behaviors implied by these specifications. The virtues of this approach to specification are expounded, and specification language features that are supportive of it are presented. It is shown how these are incorporated in the specification language Gist, which our group has developed. These issues are illustrated in a development of a controller for elevators serving passengers in a multistory building.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BALZER, R. Transformational implementation: An example. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-7, 1 (1981), 3-14.
 
2
BALZER, R., AND GOLDMAN, N. Principles of good software specification and their implications for specification languages. In Specification o{ Reliable So{tware. IEEE Computer Society, 1979, 58-67.
3
 
4
BARTLETT, A. J., CHERRIE, B. H., LEHMAN, M. M., MAcLEAN, R. I., AND POTTS, C. The role of executable metric models in the programming process--fina/ report. Tech. Rep., Dept. of Computing and Control, Imperial College, London, 1984.
 
5
DARLINGTON, J. A synthesis of several algorithms. Acta In{. 11, 1 (Dec. 1978), 1-30.
 
6
 
7
GREEN, C., LUCKHAM, D., BALZER, R., CHEATHAM, T., AND RICH, C. Report on a knowledge based software assistant. Tech. Rep. RADC-TR-83-195, Rome Air Development Center, Aug. 1983.
8
9
 
10
 
11
LONDON, P. E., AND FEATHER, M. S. Implementing specification freedoms. Sci. Comput. Program. 2 (1982), 91-131.
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
ZAVE, P. An operational approach to requirements specification for embedded systems. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng. SE-8, 3 (May 1982), 250-269.
17

CITED BY  50


REVIEW

"John D. McLean : Reviewer"

This paper presents the specification language Gist and its accompanying philosophy, the closed system specification. Such a specification describes the behavior of a total system without decomposing the system into components, as opp  more...