An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modeling

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modeling

Full text

Pdf (962 KB)

Source

Designing Interactive Systems archive
Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques table of contents

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Pages: 227 - 235

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-673-5

Author

Hermann Kaindl

Siemens AG Österreich, PSE, Geusaugasse 17, A-1030 Vienna, Austria

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IFIP WG 13.2 : IFIP WG 13.2

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 26, Citation Count: 4

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/225434.225460 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Dean Allemang, Using Functional Models in Automatic Debugging, IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, v.6 n.6, p.13-18, December 1991 [doi>10.1109/64.108947]
	2	John M. Carroll , Robert L. Mack , Scott P. Robertson , Mary Beth Rosson, Binding objects to scenarios of use, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.41 n.1-2, p.243-276, July/Aug. 1994 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1994.1058]
	3	John M. Carroll , Mary Beth Rosson, Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.10 n.2, p.181-212, April 1992 [doi>10.1145/146802.146834]
	4	B. Chandrasekaran , Ashok K. Goel , Yumi Iwasaki, Functional Representation as Design Rationale, Computer, v.26 n.1, p.48-56, January 1993 [doi>10.1109/2.179157]
	5	Anne Dardenne , Axel van Lamsweerde , Stephen Fickas, Goal-directed requirements acquisition, Science of Computer Programming, v.20 n.1-2, p.3-50, April 1993
	6	Alan M. Davis, Software requirements: objects, functions, and states, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993
	7	Dennis de Champeaux , Penelope Faure, A comparative study of object-oriented analysis methods, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, v.5 n.1, p.21-33, March/April 1992
	8	David Harel , Amir Pnueli , Hagi Lachover , Amnon Naamad , Michal Politi , Rivi Sherman , Aharon Shtull-Trauring , Mark Trakhtenbrot, STATEMATE: A Working Environment for the Development of Complex Reactive Systems, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.16 n.4, p.403-414, April 1990 [doi>10.1109/32.54292]
	9	Pei Hsia , Jayarajan Samuel , Jerry Gao , David Kung , Yasufumi Toyoshima , Cris Chen, Formal Approach to Scenario Analysis, IEEE Software, v.11 n.2, p.33-41, March 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.268953]
	10	Ivar Jacobson, Object-oriented software engineering, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1991
	11	H. Kaindl. Object-oriented approaches in software engineering and artificial intelligence. Journal of Object- Oriented Programming, 6(8):38--45, January 1994.
	12	H. Kaindl. An approach to hypertext-based requirements specification and its application. In Proceedings of the Fifth bzternational Conference on Human- Computer Interaction (INTERACT '95), Lillehammer, Norway, June 1995. IFIP.
	13	Jinwoo Kim , F. Javier Lerch, Towards a model of cognitive process in logical design: comparing object-oriented and traditional functional decomposition software methodologies, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.489-498, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States [doi>10.1145/142750.142905]
	14	Benjamin Kuipers, Commonsense reasoning about causality: deriving behavior from structure, Artificial Intelligence, v.24 n.1-3, p.169-203, Dec. 1984 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(84)90039-0]
	15	Colin Potts , Kenji Takahashi , Annie I. Antón, Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis, IEEE Software, v.11 n.2, p.21-32, March 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.268952]
	16	Jenny Preece , Yvonne Rogers , Helen Sharp , David Benyon , Simon Holland , Tom Carey, Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 1994
	17	G.-C. Roman. A taxonomy of current issues in requirements engineering. IEEE Computer, 18(4): 14-22, 1985.
	18	Kenneth S. Rubin , Adele Goldberg, Object behavior analysis, Communications of the ACM, v.35 n.9, p.48-62, Sept. 1992 [doi>10.1145/130994.130996]
	19	James Rumbaugh , Michael Blaha , William Premerlani , Frederick Eddy , William Lorensen, Object-oriented modeling and design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991
	20	J. O. P. Soares. Underlying concepts in process specification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference On Requirements Engineering (ICRE'94), pages 48-52, Colorado Springs, CO, April 1994.
	21	R. Wirfs-Brock. Adding to your conceptual tool kit: what's important about responsibility-driven design? Report on Object Analysis and Design, 1(2), 1994.
	22	Edward Yourdon, Modern structured analysis, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989

CITED BY 4

	Hermann Kaindl , John M. Carroll, Symbolic modeling in practice, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.1, p.28-30, Jan. 1999
	Larry L. Constantine , Lucy A. D. Lockwood, Use cases in task modeling and user interface design, CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
	Idris Hsi, Measuring the conceptual fitness of an application in a computing ecosystem, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Interdisciplinary software engineering research, November 05-05, 2004, Newport Beach, CA, USA
	Hermann Kaindl, A practical approach to combining requirements definition and object-oriented analysis, Annals of Software Engineering, 3, p.319-343, 1997