Decentralised process enactment in a multi-perspective development environment

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Decentralised process enactment in a multi-perspective development environment

Full text

Pdf (990 KB)

Source

International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering table of contents

Seattle, Washington, United States

Pages: 255 - 264

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-708-1

Authors

Ulf Leonhardt	Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK
Jeff Kramer	Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK
Bashar Nuseibeh	Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK

Sponsors

IEEE-CS\TCSE : TC on Software Engineering
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 16, Citation Count: 17

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/225014.225038 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Proceedings of the 3rd European Software Engineering Conference, October 1991
	2	L. Ballesteros. Using ViewPoints to Support the FU- SION Object-Oriented Method. M. SC. Thesis, Department of Computing, ImperiaJ College, London, UK, September 1992.
	3	Robert Balzer, Tolerating inconsistency, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, p.158-165, May 13-17, 1991, Austin, Texas, United States
	4	Naser S. Barghouti , Gail E. Kaiser, Scaling Up Rule-Based Software Development Environments, Proceedings of the 3rd European Software Engineering Conference, p.380-395, October 21-24, 1991
	5	Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, New Jersey. UNIX programmer's manual, seventh edition, 1983. Volume 2.
	6	Israel Z. Ben-Shaul , Gail E. Kaiser, A paradigm for decentralized process modeling and its realization in the Oz environment, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.179-188, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
	7	S. Easterbrook, A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, and B. Nuseibeh. Coordinating Distributed ViewPoints: the anatomy of a consistency check. International Journal on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Special issue on conflict management, 2(3), 1994.
	8	A. C. W. Finkelstein , D. Gabbay , A. Hunter , J. Kramer , B. Nuseibeh, Inconsistency Handling in Multiperspective Specifications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.8, p.569-578, August 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.310667]
	9	A. Finkelstein and J. Kramer. TARA: Tool assisted requirements analysis. In Conceptual Modelling, Databases & CASE: an integrated view of information system development. McGraw Hill, 1991.
	10	A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, M. Goedicke, and L. Finkelstein. ViewPoints: A Framework for integrating multiple Perspectives in System Development.International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2(1):31-58, March 1992.
	11	P. Graubmann. The HyperView Tool Standard Methods. REX technical report REX-WP3-SIE-008-V1 .0, Siemens, Germany, July 1990.
	12	P. Graubmann. The Petri Net Method ViewPoints in the HyperView Tool. REX technical report REX-WP3- SIE-021-V1.0, Siemens, Germany, January 1992.
	13	H. Iida, K. Mimura, K. Inoue, and K. Torii. Hakoniwa Monitor and navigation system for cooperative development based on activity sequence model. In %-td International Conference on the Software Process, pages 64-74, Berlin, Germany, 1993.
	14	M. Jarke, K. Pohl, C. Rolland, and J, Schmitt, Experience-Based Method Evaluation and Improvement: A Process Modeling Approach. NATURE Report Series 94-15, ESPRIT Project 6353, RWTH Aachen, Germany, 1994.
	15	Jeff Kramer, CASE Support for the Software Process: A Research Viewpoint, Proceedings of the 3rd European Software Engineering Conference, p.499-503, October 21-24, 1991
	16	Jeff Kramer , Anthony Finkelstein, A configurable framework for method and tool integration, Proceedings of the European symposium on Software development environments and CASE technology, p.233-257, June 1991, Ko¨nigswinter
	17	Fui Kien Lai. CORE in The Viewer. M. SC. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK, September 1993.
	18	U. Leonhardt, A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, and B. Nuseibeh. Decentralised process enactment. Technical Report 95/5, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK, January 199s.
	19	K. Narayanaswamy , Neil Goldman, “Lazy” consistency: a basis for cooperative software development, Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.257-264, November 01-04, 1992, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/143457.143521]
	20	B. Nuseibeh and A. Finkelstein. Viewpoints: A vehicle for method and tool integration. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE '92), pages 50-60, Montreal, Canada, July 1992. IEEE CS press.
	21	Bashar Nuseibeh , Anthony Finkelstein , Jeff Kramer, Fine-grain process modelling, Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on Software specification and design, December 06-07, 1993, Redondo Beach, California
	22	Bashar Nuseibeh , Jeff Kramer , Anthony Finkelstein, Expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification, Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, p.187-196, May 17-21, 1993, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
	23	Bashar Nuseibeh , Jeff Kramer , Anthony Finkelstein, A Framework for Expressing the Relationships Between Multiple Views in Requirements Specification, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.10, p.760-773, October 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.328995]
	24	T. Thanitsukkarn. The Constructive Viewer. M. SC. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK, September 1993.

CITED BY 17

	Denis Avrilionis , Pierre-Yves Cunin , Christer Fernström, OPSIS: a view mechanism for software processes which supports their evolution and reuse, Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering, p.38-47, March 25-29, 1996, Berlin, Germany
	Stan Jarzabek , Riri Huang, The case for user-centered CASE tools, Communications of the ACM, v.41 n.8, p.93-99, Aug. 1998
	David A. Marca , Beth A. Perdue, A software engineering approach and tool set for developing Internet applications, Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, p.738-741, June 04-11, 2000, Limerick, Ireland
	Wai Leung Poon , Anthony Finkelstein, Consistency management for multiple perspective software development, Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops, p.192-196, October 16-18, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States
	Denis Avrilionis , Pierre-Yves Cunin, View-based mechanisms for structured and distributed enactment, Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops, p.259-262, October 16-18, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States
	Anthony Finkelstein , George Spanoudakis , David Till, Managing interference, Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops, p.172-174, October 16-18, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States
	Anthony Hunter , Bashar Nuseibeh, Managing inconsistent specifications: reasoning, analysis, and action, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.7 n.4, p.335-367, Oct. 1998
	Bashar Nuseibeh , Jeff Kramer , Anthony Finkelstein, ViewPoints: meaningful relationships are difficult!, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 03-10, 2003, Portland, Oregon
	Bashar Nuseibeh , Steve Easterbrook , Alessandra Russo, Leveraging Inconsistency in Software Development, Computer, v.33 n.4, p.24-29, April 2000
	Bashar Nuseibeh, Towards a framework for managing inconsistency between multiple views, Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints '96) on SIGSOFT '96 workshops, p.184-186, October 16-18, 1996, San Francisco, California, United States
	Wolfgang Emmerich , Anthony Finkelstein , Stefano Antonelli , Stephen Armitage , Richard Stevens, Managing Standards Compliance, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.25 n.6, p.836-851, November 1999
	John Grundy , John Hosking , Warwick B. Mugridge, Inconsistency Management for Multiple-View Software Development Environments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.24 n.11, p.960-981, November 1998
	Vijay Khatri , Sudha Ram , Richard T. Snodgrass, On augmenting database design-support environments to capture the geo-spatio-temporal data semantics, Information Systems, v.31 n.2, p.98-133, April 2006
	George Spanoudakis , Anthony Finkelstein, Reconciling requirements: a method for managing interference, inconsistency and conflict, Annals of Software Engineering, 3, p.433-457, 1997
	Riri Huang, Making active CASE tools—toward the next generation CASE tools, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.23 n.1, p.47-50, January 1998
	Wing Lam , Ben Whittle, A taxonomy of domain-specific reuse problems and their resolutions—version 1.0, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.21 n.5, p.72-77, Sept. 1996
	Bashar Nuseibeh, To Be and Not to Be: On Managing Inconsistency in Software Development, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, p.164, March 22-23, 1996