ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scheduling and resource binding for low power
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (165 KB)
Source International Symposium on Systems Synthesis archive
Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on System synthesis table of contents
Cannes, France
Pages: 104 - 109  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-89791-771-5
Authors
E. Musoll  Department of Computer Architecture, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08071-Barcelona, Spain
J. Cortadella  Department of Computer Architecture, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08071-Barcelona, Spain
Sponsors
IEEE-CS\TCDA : TC Design Automation
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224486.224523
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Decisions taken at the earliest steps of the design process may have a significant impact on the characteristics of the final implementation. This paper illustrates how power consumption issues can be tackled during the scheduling and resource-binding steps of high-level synthesis. Algorithms for these steps targeting at low-power data-paths and trading off, in some cases, speed and area for low power are presented. The algorithms focus on reducing the activity of the functional units (adders, multipliers) by minimizing the transitions of their input operands. The power consumption of the functional units accounts for a large fraction of the overall data-path power budget.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
A. Chandrakasan, M. Potkonjak, J. Rabaey, and R. Brodersen. HYPER-LP: A system for power minimization using architectural transformations. IEEE Trans. on CAD, pages 300-303, Nov. 1992.
 
4
A. Chandrakasan, S. Sheng, and R. Broderssen. Low power CMOS digital design. IEEE Trans. on SSC, 27(4):473-483, Apr. 1992.
 
5
A. Chatterjee and R. Roy. Synthesis of low power linear DSP circuits using activity metrics. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on VLSI Design, pages 265-270, Jan. 1994.
6
7
 
8
E Dewilde, E. Deprettere, and R. Nouta. Parallel and pipelined VLSI implementation of signal processing algorithms, chapter 15, pages 257-264. VLSI and Modem Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985.
 
9
 
10
 
11
S. Kung. On supercomputing with systolic/wavefront array processor. In Proc. of the IEEE, pages 867-884, July 1984.
 
12
E Landman and J. Rabaey. Black-box capacitance models for architectural power analysis. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Low Power Desi~,n, pages 165-170, Apr. 1994.
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
K. Rao and E Yip. Discrete Cosine Transform. Academic Press, 1990.
 
19
 
20
A. van Gerenden. SLS: An efficient switch-level timing simulator using rain-max voltage waveforms. In Proc. VLSI 89 Conf., pages 79-88, Aug. 1989.
 
21
S. Wuytack,-F. Catthoor, F~. Franseen, L. Nachtergaele, and H. D. Man. Global communications and memory optimizing transformations for low power. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Low Power Design, pages 203-208, Apr. 1994.

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
E. Musoll: colleagues
J. Cortadella: colleagues