ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The role of simulation in operational planning and control of flexible machining cells
Full text PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 793 - 798  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-7803-3018-8
Authors
Shahin Rahimifard  Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, U.K.
Stephen T. Newman  Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, U.K.
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224401.224733
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The use of simulation as a solution to the operational planning and control problems of flexible machining cells is now well established. This paper describes the role of simulation models as: a decision support tool, a scheduler and as an aid to develop appropriate control procedures. To illustrate the ideas presented a novel framework for the simultaneous management and control of parts, fixtures and cutting tools is outlined which is termed multi-flow control. Three simulation models have been designed and implemented to carry out specific tasks within this framework. These models and their respective functionality are also described in this paper.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cheng, T.C.E., Gupta, M.C. 1989. Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions, European Journal Operational Research, 156-166.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Grippo, P.M,, Thompson, B.S., Gandhi, M.V. 1988. A review of flexible fixturing systems for computer integrated manufacturing, international Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1 (2), 124-135.
 
5
Gupta, M.C., Gupta, Y.P., Evans, G.W. 1993. Operations planning and scheduling problems in advanced manufacturing systems, International Journal of Production Research, 31 (4), 869-900.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Mertines, K., Wieneke-Toutaoui, B. 1991. State of the art in flexible manufacturing system design, Production Planning and Control, 2 (2), 155-159.
 
9
Rahimifard, S., Newman, S.T. 1995. Simultaneous scheduling of workpieces, fixtures and cutting tools within flexible machining ceils, submitted to International Journal of Production Research.
 
10
 
11
Stecke, K.E. 1988. Design, planning, scheduling and control problems of flexible manufacturing systems, Intelligent Manufacturing, ed. M.Oliff, 189-198. Benjamin/Cummings.
 
12
Systems Modeling Corporation. 1994. ARENA template user guide, Systems Modeling Corporation, Sewickley, U.S.A.
 
13
Tempelmeier, H. 1992. Design of machining systems. In Intelligent Design and Manufacturing, ed. A. Kusiak, 303-325. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
 
14
The CIMulation Centre. 1994. PREACTOR user manual, The CIMulation Centre, Chippenham, Wiltshire, U.K.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shahin Rahimifard: colleagues
Stephen T. Newman: colleagues