ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Performance analysis of future event sets
Full text PdfPdf (554 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 316 - 321  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-7803-3018-8
Authors
Halim Damerdji  Department of Industrial Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Peter W. Glynn  Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224401.224625
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The linked list and indexed list future event sets are investigated. The interaction hold model and the Jackson network model are the underlying stochastic models considered. For the interaction hold model and for the (doubly) linked list, we find, for example, the mean number of key comparisons performed in order to find a record's insertion point into the list; this is useful when deciding whether to scan from the head or the tail of the list. The distribution of the relative position of the to-be-inserted record is also obtained; for indexed lists, this is helpful when deciding the number of sublists and position(s) of the middle pointer(s). The Jackson network model has a realistic event logic, but events are restricted to be exponentially distributed. Because the stationary probabilities can be computed for this model, it is then possible to evaluate and compare the (steady-state) performance of certain future event sets (e.g. linked lists scanned from the head or the tail).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Barlow, I~ E. and Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: P~vbability Models. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
 
2
Damerdji, H. and Glynn, P. W. (1995). Limit theory for performance modeling of hlture event set algorithms. In preparation.
 
3
Davey, D. and Vaucher, J. (1980). Self-optimizing partitioned sequencing sets for discrete event simulations. INFOR, 18, 41-61.
 
4
Devroye, L. (1986). Nonuniform Random Variate Generation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
5
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, 1-~ and Maxwell, W. L. (1978). Analysis of the time indexed list procedure for synchronization of discrete event simulations. Management Science, 24, 1417-1427.
6
7
 
8
Meyn, S. P. and Tweedie, ~ L. (1993). Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer-Verlag, London.
 
9
Vaucher, J. G. (1977). On the distribution of event times for the notices in a simulation event list. IN- FOR, 15~ 171-182.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Halim Damerdji: colleagues
Peter W. Glynn: colleagues