ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parallel and distributed simulation
Full text PdfPdf (885 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Pages: 118 - 125  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-7803-3018-8
Author
Richard M. Fujimoto  College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Sponsors
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
SCS : Society for Computer Simulation
ASA : American Statistical Association
NIST : National Institue of Standards & Technology
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
INFORMS/CS : Computer Science TC
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society  Washington, DC, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224401.224452
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Research and development efforts in the parallel and distributed simulation field over the last 15 years has progressed, largely independently, in two separate camps: the largely academic high performance parallel and distributed (discrete event) simulation (PADS) community, and the DoD-centered distributed interactive simulation (DIS) community. This tutorial gives an overview and comparison of work in these two areas, emphasizing issues related to distributed execution where these fields have the most overlap. Differences in the fundamental assumptions routinely used within each community are contrasted, followed by overviews of work in each community.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Chandy, K. M. and J. Misra. 1979. Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-5 (5), 440-452.
2
 
3
 
4
DiCaprio, P. N., C. J. Chiang, and D. J. Van Hook. 1994. PICA performance in a lossy communications environment. In 11th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distmbuted Simulations, Volume 2, pp. 363-366.
 
5
DIS Steering Committee. 1994. The DIS vision, a map to the future of distributed simulation. Technical Report IST-SP-94-01, Institute for Simulation and Training, Orlando, Florida.
 
6
7
8
 
9
Ghosh, K. and R. M. Fujimoto. 1991. Parallel discrete event simulation using space-time memory. in Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Parallel Processing, Volume 3, pp. 201- 208.
10
 
11
Golner, M. and E. Pollak. 1994. The application of network time protocol (NTP) to implementing dis absolute timetamps. In 11th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distmbuted Simulat,ons, Volume 2, pp. 431-440.
 
12
IEEE 1278. 1993. Standard for information technology - protocols for distributed interactive simulation applications.
13
 
14
Kanarick, C. 1991. A technical overview and history of the SIMNET project. In Advances in Parallel and Distributed Simulation, Volume 23, pp. 104- 111.
 
15
Katz, A. 1994. Synchronization of networked simulators. In 11th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, Volume 2, pp. 81-87.
 
16
Kress, J., J. R. Phipps, and D. Carver, Jr. 1994. Synchronization of large scale distributed simulations and programs. In l Oth Workshop on Standards for the interoperabzl~ty of Distributed Simulations, Volume 2, pp. 611-623.
 
17
18
 
19
Mills, D. L. 1992. Network Time Protocol (version 3) specification, implementation, and analysis.
20
21
 
22
Sokol, L. M., D. P. Briscoe, and A. P. Wieland. 1988. MTW: a strategy for scheduling discrete simulation events for concurrent execution. In Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distmbuted Szmulatzon, Volume 19, pp. 34-42.
23
 
24
Van Hook, D. J., J. O. Calvin, M. Newton, and D. Fusco. 1994. An approach to DIS scalability. in 11th Workshop on Standards for the Interoperability of Distributed Simulations, Volume 2, pp. 347-356.
 
25
Wieland, F., L. Hawley, A. Feinberg, M. DiLorento, L. Blume, P. Reiher, B. Beckman, P. Hontalas, S. Bellenot, and D. R. Jefferson. 1989. Distributed combat simulation and Time Warp: The model and its performance. In Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Szmulation, Volume 21, pp. 14-20.
 
26

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard M. Fujimoto: colleagues