ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Workflow technology: trade-offs for business process re-engineering
Full text PdfPdf (868 KB)
Source Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems table of contents
Milpitas, California, United States
Pages: 22 - 29  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-89791-706-5
Authors
Keith D. Swenson  Fujitsu Open Systems Solutions, Inc., 3055 Orchard Dr., San Jose, CA
Kent Irwin  Fujitsu Open Systems Solutions, Inc., 3055 Orchard Dr., San Jose, CA
Sponsors
IFIP WG 8.4 : IFIP WG 8.4
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
IEEE-CS\TCOS : TC on Operating Systems & Application Environments
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/224019.224022
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The relationship is examined between Business Process Reengineering (BPR), a significant new management trend across all industries, and Workflow Technology a new and rapidly expanding sector of the software market. Since Workflow is a market driven technology, in order to make a meaningful analysis, we start by presenting the current state of the art in workflow technology, as uncovered by our work within the Workflow Management Coalition. Some aspects of workflow are found to be well suited to support BPR, as long as the process being supported meets one of three criteria. Yet other aspects result in serious drawbacks that limit the benefit gained. Some conclusions are made about how workflow technology will have to evolve in order to more fully support the needs of BPR.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Clarence A Ellis, Jacques Wainer, Goal Based Models of Collaboration, Journal of Collaborative Computing, 1 (1), p61-86, March 1994
5
 
6
7
 
8
Thomas Malone, K Crowston, J Lee, B Pentland, Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes, In Proc. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET-ICE) April 1993 pp 72-82
 
9
Michael Hammer, Re-engineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate, Harvard Business Review, July/August 1990
 
10
Michael Hammer, James Champy, Re-engineering the Corporation, Harper Collins, New York, 1993
 
11
Michael S Scott Morton, The Corporation of the 1990s, Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1991
 
12
Keith D Swenson, A Visual Language to Describe Collaborative Work, Proceeding of the International Workshop on Visual Languages, Bergen Norway, August 1993
13
 
14
Keith D Swenson, Kent Irwin, Robin Maxwell, Toshikazu Matsumoto, Bahrain Saghari, A Business Process Environment Supporting Collaborative Planning, Journal of Collaborative Computing, 1 (1) March 1994
 
15
Michael Zisman, Representation, Specification, and Automation of Office Procedures, PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1977


Collaborative Colleagues:
Keith D. Swenson: colleagues
Kent Irwin: colleagues