ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Destage algorithms for disk arrays with non-volatile caches
Full text PdfPdf (1.63 MB)
Source International Symposium on Computer Architecture archive
Proceedings of the 22nd annual international symposium on Computer architecture table of contents
S. Margherita Ligure, Italy
Pages: 83 - 95  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-89791-698-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Anujan Varma  Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
Quinn Jacobson  Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
Sponsors
IEEE-CS\TCCA : TC on Computer Arhitecture
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/223982.224042
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a disk array with a nonvolatile write cache, destages from the cache to the disk are performed in the background asynchronously while read requests from the host system are serviced in the foreground. In this paper, we study a number of algorithms for scheduling destages in a RAID-5 system. We introduce a new scheduling algorithm, called linear threshold scheduling, that adaptively varies the rate of destages to disks based on the instantaneous occupancy of the write cache. The performance of the algorithm is compared with that of a number of alternative scheduling approaches such as least-cost scheduling and high/low mark. The algorithms are evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in making destages transparent to the servicing of read requests from the host, disk utilization, and their ability to tolerate bursts in the workload without causing an overflow of the write cache. Our results show that linear threshold scheduling provides the best read performance of all the algorithms compared, while still maintaining a high degree of burst tolerance. An approximate implementation of the linear-threshold scheduling algorithm is also described. The approximate algorithm can be implemented with much lower overhead, yet its performance is virtually identical to that of the ideal algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
P. J. Denning, "Effect of Scheduling on File Memory Operations," AFIPS Sprang Joznt Computer Conference, April 1967, pp. 9-21.
 
4
5
 
6
D.M. Jacobson and J. Wilkes, "Disk Scheduling Algorithms Based on Rotational Position," Technical Report HPL-CSP- 91-7, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, February 1991.
 
7
J. Menon and D. Mattson, "Performance of Disk Arrays in Transaction Processing Environments," Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on D~str~buted Computing Systems, June 1992, pp. 302-309.
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
C. Ruemmler and J. Wilkes, "UNIX Disk Access Patterns," Proceedzngs of the Wznter 1993 USENIX Conference, January 1993, pp. 405-420.
 
13
 
14
M. Seltzer, P. Chert, and J. Ousterhout, "Disk Scheduling Revisited," Proceedings of the Wznter 1990 USENIX Conference, January 1990, pp. 313-324.
15
16
 
17
The RAIDBook, The RAID Advisory Board, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, June 1993.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Anujan Varma: colleagues
Quinn Jacobson: colleagues