Context sensitive case comparisons in practical ethics

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Context sensitive case comparisons in practical ethics: reasoning about reasons

Full text

Pdf (1.14 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 316 - 325

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

Bruce M. McLaren	University of Pittsburgh, Intelligent Systems Program, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kevin D. Ashley	University of Pittsburgh, Intelligent Systems Program, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 12, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222266 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, An instructional environment for practicing argumentation skills, Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 1), p.485-492, October 1994, Seattle, Washington, United States
	2	Kevin D. Ashley, Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1988
	3	Kevin D. Ashley , Bruce M. McLaren, A CBR Knowledge Representation for Practical Ethics, Selected papers from the Second European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, p.181-197, November 07-10, 1994
	4	Augustine (edited 1952). "Lying" and "Against Lying." In Treatises on Various Subjects, vols 14, 16. Edited by R. J. Deferrari, Catholic University of America Press.
	5	Beauchamp, T. and McCullough, L. B. (1984). Medical Ethics: The Moral Responsibilities of Physicians. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
	6	Donald H. Berman , Carole D. Hafner, Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.50-59, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158982]
	7	Bok, S. (1989). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. Random House, Inc. Vintage Books, New York.
	8	L. Karl Branting, Building explanations from rules and structured cases, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.6, p.797-837, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90012-V]
	9	Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
	10	Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
	11	Gentner, D. (1983) Structure Mapping: ATheoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science 7, pages 155-170.
	12	Jonsen A. R. and Toulmin S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of CA Press, Berkeley.
	13	Kathleen R. McKeown, Discourse strategies for generating natural-language text, Artificial Intelligence, v.27 n.1, p.1-41, Sept. 1985 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(85)90082-7]
	14	MacGregor, R. (1990) The Evolving Technology of Classification-Based Knowledge Representation Systems. In John F. Sowa, editor. Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge. Chapter 13. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA.
	15	Edwina L. Rissland , David B. Skalak, CABARET: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.6, p.839-887, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90013-W]
	16	Edwina L. Rissland , David B. Skalak , M. Timur Friedman, BankXX: a program to generate argument through case-base research, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-124, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158991]
	17	Sidgwick, H. (1907). Classification of Duties- Veracity. In The Methods ofEthics. 7th edition London: MacMillan & Co.
	18	Strong, C. (1988). Justification in Ethics. In Baruch A. Brody, editor, Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics, pages 193-211. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.