ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Intelligent computer systems for criminal sentencing
Full text PdfPdf (843 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
College Park, Maryland, United States
Pages: 229 - 238  
Year of Publication: 1995
ISBN:0-89791-758-8
Author
Uri J. Schild  Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Center for Computers and Law, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
Sponsors
IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222247
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Ashley90
Ashley K.D. Modeling Legal Argument MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990
 
Ashley92
Ashley K.D. Case-Based Reasoning and its Implications for Legal Expert Systems Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1, 1992, p.l 13-208
 
Bain89
Berman89
Branting91
 
Davis77
Davis R., BUchanan B., Shortliffe E. Production Rules as a Representation for a Knowledge-Based Consultation Program. Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1977
 
DeMulder83
DeMulder R.V., Gubby H.M. Legal Decision Making by Computer: An Experiment with Sentencing. Computer / Law Journal, IV, 1983, p.243-303
 
Doob87
Doob A.N., Park N.W. Computerized Sentencing Information for Judges Criminal Law Quarterly, 30, 1987- 88
Hafner87
 
Hasset93
Hasset P. Can Expert System Technology Contribute to Improved Bail Conditions Int. J. of Law and Information Technology, vol. 1, p. 144-188
 
Hasset94
Hasset P. Private Communication.
 
Hogarth88
Hogarth J. Computer and the Law: Sentencing Database System, User's Guide
 
Johnson85
 
Kolodner93
Kokxtner J. Case-Based Reasoning Morgan Kaulirtan Publishers, San Mateo, California, i993
 
Love89
Lovegrove A. Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy and Numerical Guidance Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1989
 
Reynolds93
 
Riesbeck89
Rissland87
 
Schank94
Simon89
 
Shapira90
Shapira M. Computerized Decision Technology in Social Service Int. J. of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 10, 1990, p. 138-164
 
Skalak92
Skalak D.B., Rissland E.L. Arguments and Ca~cs Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 1, p.3-44
 
Wellbank83
Wellbank M. A Review of Knowledge Acquisition Techniques for Expert Systems. British Telecom, Ipswitch, 1983