The split-up system

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain

Full text

Pdf (757 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 185 - 194

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

John Zeleznikow	Collaborative Law and Artificial Intelligence Research Project, Database Research Laboratory, Applied Computing, Research Institute, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia 3083
Andrew Stranieri	Collaborative Law and Artificial Intelligence Research Project, Database Research Laboratory, Applied Computing, Research Institute, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia 3083

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 14

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222235 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Lowes, D., and McEnery, A.M., 1991. Argument-based explanation of logic programs Knowledge Based Systems. Vol 4(3) p 177-84.
	2	Trevor Bench-Capon, Neural networks and open texture, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.292-297, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159012]
	3	Boyle, J.D.A. 1985. The politics of reason: Critical legal theory and social thought. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 133. p685-780.
	4	L. Karl Branting, Building explanations from rules and structured cases, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.6, p.797-837, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90012-V]
	5	Branting, K., 1994. A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi. Artificial Intelligence & Law Vol 2 p 1-31.
	6	Clark, P., 1991. A Model of Argumentation and Its Application in a Cooperative Expert System. PhD thesis. Turing Institute. Department of Computer Science. University of Strathclyde. Glasgow.
	7	Judith P. Dick, Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.244-253, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112676]
	8	Judith P. Dick, A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval, 1991
	9	Dworkin, R. M., 1967. The Model of Rules. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol 35. p14-46.
	10	Edwards, L., and Huntley, J.A.K., 1992. Creating a Civil Jurisdiction Adviser. Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence. Vol 1 (1). p5-40.
	11	Fahlman, S. E., 1988. Faster learning variations on back propagation: An empirical study, in Touretzkey, D.S., Hinton,G.E., and Sejmowlski,T.J., (eds) Proceedings of the 1988 Conference of Connectionist Models Summer School. Morgan Kaufman. San Mateo. p38-51.
	12	Thomas F. Gordon, The pleadings game: formalizing procedural justice, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.10-19, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158978]
	13	Harris, T., Maclntyre, J., Smith, P., and Medskar, L., 1994. Neural Networks and Expert Systems: Complimentary Technologies that Can Work Together. in Milne, R., and Montgomery, A. (eds) Applications and Innovations in Expert Systems H. Proceedings of Expert Systems 94. Cambridge. SGES Publications. p 249-259.
	14	Hunter, D., 1994. Looking for law in all the wrong places: legal theory and legal neural networks in Prakken, H., Muntjewerf, F.F., Soeteman, A.J, and Winkels, R. (eds) Legal Knowledge Based Systems: the relation with legal theory. Lelystad: Vermande. p 55-64.
	15	Paul E. Johnson , Imran A. Zualkernan , David Tukey, Types of expertise: an invariant of problem solving, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.39 n.4, p.641-665, Oct. 1993 [doi>10.1006/imms.1993.1077]
	16	Kennedy, D. 1986. Freedom and constraint in adjudication: A critical phenomenology. Journal of Legal Education. Vol. 36. p518-562.
	17	Leith, P., 1992. The problem with law in books and law,in computers: the oral nature of law. Artificial Intelligence Review Vol 6 p227-241.
	18	Liang, T. P. and Moskowitz, H., 1992. Integrating Neural Networks and Semi-Markov Processes for Automated Knowledge Acquisition: an application in real time scheduling. Decision Sciences. Vol 23. p 1298-1321.
	19	C. C. Marshall, Representing the structure of a legal argument, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.121-127, May 1989, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada [doi>10.1145/74014.74031]
	20	Straniefi, A. and Zeleznikow, J., 1992, SPLIT-UP: A system to determine spousal property distribution on litigation in the Family Court of Australia, in Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Artificial Intelligence Conference., Hobart: World Scientific. p51-56.
	21	Stranieri, A., Gawler, M. and Zeleznikow, J., 1994, Toulmin Structures as a Higher Level Abstraction for Hybrid Reasoning, Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Artificial Intelligence Congress AI'94. Armidale. World Scientific. Singapore. p203-210.
	22	Toulmin, S., 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
	23	R. F. Walker , A. Oskamp , J. A. Schrickx , G. J. van Opdorp , P. H. van den Berg, PROLEXS: creating law and order in a heterogeneous domain, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.35 n.1, p.35-67, July 1991 [doi>10.1016/S0020-7373(07)80007-1]
	24	Michael R. Wick , William B. Thompson, Reconstructive expert system explanation, Artificial Intelligence, v.54 n.1-2, p.33-70, March 1992 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(92)90087-E]
	25	Zeleznikow, J. and Hunter, D. 1994. Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems, Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation.

CITED BY 14

	Andrew Stranieri , John Yearwood , John Zeleznikow, Tools for World Wide Web based legal decision support systems, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.206-214, May 2001, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
	L. Karl Branting , Charles B. Callaway , Bradford W. Mott , James C. Lester, Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document drafting, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.214-220, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	John Zeleznikow , Andrew Stranieri, Knowledge discovery in the Split Up project, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.89-97, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	John Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-125, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Daniel Poulin , Guy Huard , Alain Lavoie, The other formalization of law: SGML modelling and tagging, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.82-88, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	L. Karl Branting , James C. Lester , Charles B. Callaway, Automated drafting of self-explaining documents, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.72-81, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Marie-Francine Moens , Rik De Busser, First steps in building a model for the retrieval of court decisions, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.57 n.5, p.429-446, November 2002
	Bryn Lewis , Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow, Scaling of neural network inferencing by efficient storage and retrieval of outputs, Proceedings of the 1997 ACM symposium on Applied computing, p.10-14, April 1997, San Jose, California, United States
	Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow, Levels of reasoning as the basis for a formalisation of argumentation, Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Information and knowledge management, p.333-339, November 29-December 02, 1995, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
	Stefanie Bruninghaus , Kevin D. Ashley, Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom
	John L. Yearwood , Andrew Stranieri, The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning, Decision Support Systems, v.41 n.2, p.358-379, January 2006
	Andrew Stranieri , John Zeleznikow , John Yearwood, Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.16 n.4, p.331-348, December 2001
	Teresa Gonçalves , Paulo Quaresma, Is linguistic information relevant for the classification of legal texts?, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 06-11, 2005, Bologna, Italy
	Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon , Paul E. Dunne, Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.13 n.1, p.1-8, January 2005