DiaLaw

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

DiaLaw: a dialogical framework for modeling legal reasoning

Full text

Pdf (1.06 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 146 - 155

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

Arno R. Lodder	University of Limburg, Faculty of law, P.O. Box 616; 6200 MD Maastricht; The Netherlands
Aimée Herczog	University of Nijmegen, Faculty of Mathematics, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 8

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222225 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, Automated Generation of Examples for a Tutorial in Case-Based Argumentation, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, p.475-584, June 10-12, 1992
	2	Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie der juristischen Argumentatio,. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
	3	Kevin D. Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
	4	Bench-Capon, T.J.M., D Lowes and A.M. McEnery (1991), Argument-based explanation of logic programs, in: Knowledge Based Systems, Vol 4 No 3, September 1991, pp. 177-183.
	5	Bench-Capon, T.J.M., P.E.$. Dunne and P.H. Leng (1992). A dialogue game for dialectical interaction with expert systems, in: Proceedings of the I2th Expert Systems Conference, Avignon, 1992.
	6	Brewka, Gerhard (1994). A Reconstruction of Rescher's Theory of Formal Disputation Based on Default Logic. in: A. G. Colin (ed.), Proceedings of tile 11 th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, August 8-12 1994, pp. 366-370.
	7	Cavalli-Sforza, V., and D. D. Suthers. (1994) Belvedere: an Environment for Practicing Scientific Argumentation. Workshop notes. AAAI workshop 1994 COMPUTATIONAL DIALECTICS.
	8	Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst (1982). Regels voor redelijke discussies. Een bijdrage tot de theoretische attalyse van argumentatie ter oplossing'van geschi!len. PHD-thesis, Foris, Dordrecht.
	9	Feteris, E.T. (1989). Discussie regels in bet recht. Een pragmadialectische analyse van het burgerlijk en het strafproces. PHD-thesis, Foris, Dordrecht.
	10	Thomas F. Gordon, The pleadings game: formalizing procedural justice, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.10-19, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158978]
	11	Gordon, Thomas F. (1993b). The Pleadings Game - An artificial bltelligence model of procedural justice. PHD-thesis, Teclmische Hochschule Darmstadt, Germany.
	12	Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.2 n.4, p.239-292, 1993/1994 [doi>10.1007/BF00871972]
	13	Habermas, J. (1973). Walu-heitstheorien. in: {D'rklichkeit trod Reflexion, Fcstschrift f. W. Schulz, ltr~g, v. H. Faltrcnbach, Pfullingen, pp. 211-265.
	14	Jaap Hage, Monological reason-based logic: a low level integration of rule-based reasoning and case-based reasoning, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.30-39, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158980]
	15	Hage, J., and Verheij, B. (1995). Reason-Based Logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons. To appear in Law, Computers and Arttficial Intelligence, Vol. 3, No. 2.
	16	Jaap C. Hage , Ronald Leenes , Arno R. Lodder, Hard cases: a procedural approach, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.2 n.1, p.113-167, 1993/1994
	17	Hage, J.C., Span, G.P.J. and Lodder, A.R. (1992), A Dialogical Model of Legal Reasoning, in Grtitters, C.A.F.M. et al. (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Information Technology and Law , JURL~ '92, Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad, NL
	18	Hamblin, Ci. (1970). Fallacies. Richard Clay (The Chaucer press) Ltd, Bungay, Suffolk.
	19	Leenes, R.E., A.R. Lodder, J.C. Hage (1994). A dialogue game tbr legal arguments. Proceedings of the fourth national conference on law, computers and artificial intelligence, I. Cart and A. Narayanan (eds.). p. 112-122. Exeter, England.
	20	Lorenz, K. (1961). Arithmetik und Logik als Spiele. PHD-thesis. Kiel.
	21	Loui , R.P. (1992). Process and Policy: Resource-Bounded Non- Demonstrative Reasoning. Wash. U. Comp. Sci, WUCS-92- 43.
	22	Mackenzie, J.D., Question-Begging in non-cumulative systems, in: dounlal of Philosophical Logic, 8 (1979) 117-133, 1979.
	23	Katsumi Nitta , Stephen Wong , Yoshihisa Ohtake, A computational model for trial reasoning, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.20-29, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158979]
	24	Perehnan, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1971 ). The New Rhetoric A D'eatise on Argumention. University of Notre Dame Press, London.
	25	Prakken, H. (1993). Logical tools for modelling legal argument, Ph.-D.-thesis gansterdam.
	26	Rawls, Jolm ( 1971). A theory of justice. Oxford university press.
	27	Rescher (1977). DIALECTICS. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany.
	28	Searle (1969), J.R. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge university press.
	29	Skalak, D.B. and Rissland, E.L. (1992). Arguments and Cases: All hlevitable hltertwining. Artificial intelligence and Law, vol 1 hr. 1, p. 3-44.
	30	St-Vincent, P., and D. Poulin. Vagueness, Open texture and Computational dialectics. Workshop notes. AAAI workshop 1994 COMPUTATIONAL DIALECTICS.
	31	Touhnin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, London, New York.
	32	Verheij, B. (1995). Accrual of arguments in &feasible argumentation. Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Proceedings of the Second Workshop, pp. 217- 224. Delft University of Technology, Utrecht University.

CITED BY 8

	Carlos Iván Chesñevar , Ana Gabriela Maguitman , Ronald Prescott Loui, Logical models of argument, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.32 n.4, p.337-383, Dec. 2000
	James Palmer, Legal merit arguments, legal semiotics and the design of legal knowledge-based systems, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.198-206, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Marius J. A. Duker , Arno R. Lodder, Sentencing and information management: consistency and the particularities of a case, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.100-107, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Ronald P. Loui , Jeff Norman , Joe Altepeter , Dan Pinkard , Dan Craven , Jessica Linsday , Mark Foltz, Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.207-214, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Bart Verheij , Jaap Hage , Arno R. Lodder, Logical tools for legal argument: a practical assessment in the domain of tort, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.243-249, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Peter Rittgen, A language-mapping approach to action-oriented development of information systems, European Journal of Information Systems, v.15 n.1, p.70-81, February 2006
	Tangming Yuan , David Moore , Alec Grierson, A Human-Computer Dialogue System for Educational Debate: A Computational Dialectics Approach, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v.18 n.1, p.3-26, January 2008
	T. J. M. Bench-Capon , Paul E. Dunne, Argumentation in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, v.171 n.10-15, p.619-641, July, 2007