Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine

Full text

Pdf (1.03 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 42 - 51

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

Donald H. Berman	Northeastern University, Boston, MA
Carole D. Hafner	Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222116 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Kevin D. Ashley, Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991
	2	Kevin D. Ashley , Vincent Aleven, Toward an intelligent tutoring system for teaching law students to argue with cases, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.42-52, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112651]
	3	K. D. Ashley , E. L. Rissland, Ashley,K. D.-But, see, accord: generating blue book citations in HYPO, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.67-74, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41744]
	4	Berman, D. 1989. The Need for a Medium Grain Choice of Law Filter in Certain Legal Expert Systems. In A. Martino (Ed.) Pre-proceedings of the Third International Conference on Logica Informatica Diritto, 65-81. Florence: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.
	5	Berman, D. & Hafner C. 1988. "Obstacles to the Development of Logic-Based Models of Legal Reasoning", in Computer Power and Legal Reasoning,, Walter, C. (Ed.). New York: Quorum: New York
	6	Donald H. Berman , Carole D. Hafner, Incorporating procedural context into a model of case-based legal reasoning, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.12-20, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112648]
	7	Donald H. Berman , Carole D. Hafner, Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.50-59, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158982]
	8	L. Karl Branting, Reasoning with portions of precedents, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.145-154, May 1991, Oxford, England [doi>10.1145/112646.112664]
	9	L. Karl Branting, A reduction-graph model of ratio decidendi, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.40-49, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158981]
	10	Thomas F. Gordon, The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.2 n.4, p.239-292, 1993/1994 [doi>10.1007/BF00871972]
	11	Jaap C. Hage , Ronald Leenes , Arno R. Lodder, Hard cases: a procedural approach, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.2 n.1, p.113-167, 1993/1994
	12	Holmes, O. 1897. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review 10: 457.
	13	Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revollutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	14	Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	15	Levi, E. H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	16	LLewellyn, K. N. 1960. Bramble Bush. New York: Oceana Press
	17	Ronald P. Loui , Jeff Norman , Jon Olson , Andrew Merrill, A design for reasoning with policies, precedents, and rationales, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.202-211, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159002]
	18	Henry Prakken, A logical framework for modelling legal argument, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.1-9, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158977]
	19	Rissland, E. 1978. Understanding Understanding Mathematics. Cognitive Sicence 1(4).
	20	E. L. Rissland , K. D. Ashley, A case-based system for trade secrets law, Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.60-66, May 27-29, 1997, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/41735.41743]
	21	Edwina L. Rissland , David B. Skalak , M. Timur Friedman, BankXX: a program to generate argument through case-base research, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.117-124, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158991]
	22	Sartor, G. 1992. Normative Conflicts in Legal Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence and Law 1(2/3): 209-237.

CITED BY 2

	L. Karl Branting, A reduction-graph model of precedent in legal analysis, Artificial Intelligence, v.150 n.1-2, p.59-95, November 2003
	Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.11 n.4, p.271-287, January 2003