Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism

Full text

Pdf (1.27 MB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 21 - 30

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Author

Ronald P. Loui

Department of Computer Science, Washington University, St. Louis

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 33, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222099 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Carlos E. Alchourrón, Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals, Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 1994
	2	Audi, R. Practical Reasoning, Routledge, 1989.
	3	Austin, J. Philosophical Papers, Oxford, 196 I.
	4	Baker, B. "The excuse of accident," Ethics 93, 1983.
	5	Baker, G. "A new foundation for semantics," Ratio 16, 1974.
	6	Baker, G. "Defeasibility and Meaning," in P. Hacker and J. Raz, eds., Law, Morality and Society, Oxford, 1977.
	7	Barry, B. Political Argument, U. C. Berkeley, 1965.
	8	Bayles, M. Hart's Legal Philosophy, Kluwer, 1992.
	9	Belzer, M. "Reasoning with defeasible principles," Synthese 66, 1986.
	10	Bentham, J. "Of human actions in general," An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislation, with notes by L. Lafleur, Hafner, 1948a. Also W. Harrison, ed., Oxford, 1948b. J. Bums and H. L. A. Hart, eds. Athtone, 1970.
	11	Bix, B. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy, Oxford, 1993.
	12	Causey, R. "The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning," Minds and Machines 1, 1991.
	13	Cherry, C. "The limits of defeasibility," Analysis 34, 1974.
	14	Chisholm, R. "The ethics of requirement," Am. Phil. Q. 1, 1964a.
	15	Chisholm, R. "The descriptive element in the concept of action," J. Phil. 61, 1964b.
	16	Doyle, J. A Model for Deliberation, Action, and Introspection, MIT doctoral dissertation, 1980.
	17	Ewing, A. C. The Individual, The State, and World Government, New York Press, 1947.
	18	Feinberg, J. "Action and Responsibility," in M. Black, ed., Philosophy in America, Cornell, 1965.
	19	Feinberg, J. Doing and Deserving, Princeton, 1970.
	20	Firth, R. "Coherence, certainty, and epistemic priority," J. Phil. 61, 1964.
	21	Frankena, W. Science, Language, and Human Rights, Univ. Penn. Press, 1952.
	22	Frankena, W. "Natural and inalienable fights," Phil. Rev. 64, 1955.
	23	Gauthier, D. Practical Reasoning, Oxford, 1963.
	24	Geach, P. "Ascriptivism," Phil. Rev. 69, 1960.
	25	Geach, P. "Assertion," in J. Rosenberg and C. Travis, eds., Readings in the Phil. of Language, Prentice-Hall, 1971. Originally Phil. Rev. 74, 1965.
	26	Hampshire, S. "J. L. Austin 1911 - 1960," 96-Symp~sium9 J.L. Austin, K. Farm, ed., Humanities Press, I .
	27	Hampshire, S. and H. L. A. Hart. "Decision, intention, and certainty," Mind 67, 1958.
	28	Hare, R. M. "Meaning'and speech acts," Phil. Rev. 79, 1970.
	29	Hart, H.L.A. "The ascription of responsibility and rights," in A. Flew, ed., Logic and Eanguage, B-lackwell, 1951. Originally Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1948-9.
	30	Hart, H. L. A. "A logician's fairy tale," Phil. Rev. 60, 1951.
	31	Hart, H. L. A. "Are there any natural rights?" Phil. Rev. 64, 1955.
	32	Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law, Oxford, 196 t.
	33	Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford, 1968.
	34	Hart, H. L. A. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, 1983.
	35	Howarth, W. "The feasibility of defeasibility," Cambrian Law Review 12, 1981.
	36	Kaufmann, J. "Philosophique analytique de l'action," Dialogue 23, 1984.
	37	Lascarides, A. and J. Oberlander. "Temporal coherence and defeasible knowledge," Theoretical Linguistics 18, 1992.
	38	Ladd, J. The Structure of A Moral Code, Harvard, 1957.
	39	Lehrer, K. and T. Paxson, Jr. "Knowledge: undefeated justified true belief," J. Phil. 66, 1969.
	40	Loewer, B. and M. Belzer. "Prima Facie obligation: its deconstruction and reconstruction," in John Searle and His Critics, E. LePore and R. van Gulick, eds., B lackwell, 1991.
	41	Loui, R. "Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference," Comp. Intell. 3, 1987.
	42	Loui, R. "Ampliative inference, computation, and dialectic," in R. Cummins and J. Pollock, eds., Philosophy and AI, MIT, 1991.
	43	MacCormick, N. H. L. A. Hart, Stanford, 1981.
	44	Mackie, J. "Responsibility and language," Austr. J. Phil. 33, 1955.
	45	McCarty, T. "Defeasible legal rules," AAAI Workshop on Computational Dialectics, Seattle, 1994.
	46	Melden, A. "Action," Phil. Rev. 65, 1956.
	47	Melden, A. Rights and Right Conduct, Oxford, 1959.
	48	Nell, O. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, Columbia Univ. Press, 1971.
	49	Nozick, R. "Moral complications and moral structures," Natural Law Forum 13, 1968.
	50	Nute, D. "Defeasible reasoning: a philosophical analysis in Prolog," in J. Fetzer, ed. Aspects ofAl, Kluwer, 1988.
	51	Perelman, C. The Idea of Justice and The Problem of Argument, Humanities Press, 1963.
	52	Pitcher, D. "Hart on Action," Phil. Rev. 69, 1960.
	53	Pollock, J. "Criteria and our knowledge of the material world," Phil. Rev. 76, 1967.
	54	Pollock, J. Knowledge and Justification, Princeton, 1974.
	55	Pollock, J. "Defeasible reasoning," Cognitive Science 11, 1987.
	56	Pollock, J. Nomic Probability and The Foundations of Induction, Oxford, 1990.
	57	Prior, A. Logic and The Basis of Ethics, Oxford, 1949.
	58	Rayfield, D. "Action," Nous 11, 1968.
	59	Raz, J. Practical Reason and Norms, Princeton, 1970.
	60	Rescher, N. Dialectics, SUNY Albany Press, 1977.
	61	Ross, W. D. The Right and The Good, Oxford, 1930.
	62	Searle, J. Speech Acts, Cambridge, 1969.
	63	Searle, J. "Prima Facie obligations," in J. Raz, Practical Reasoning, Oxford, 1978.
	64	Sosa, E. "Two conceptions of knowledge," J. Phil. 67, 1970.
	65	Stevenson, C. "Persuasive definitions," Mind 67, 1938.
	66	Swain, M., ed. Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, Reidel, 1970.
	67	Swain, M. "Epistemic Defeasibility," in G. Pappas and M. Swain, eds. Essays on Knowledge and Justification, Comell, 1978.
	68	Toulmin, S. The Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge, 1950.
	69	Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, 1958.
	70	Waismann, F. "Verifiability," in A. Flew, ed., Logic and Language, Blackwell, 1951.
	71	Williams, G. Criminal Law, The General Part, Stevens, 1953.

CITED BY 2

	Carlos Iván Chesñevar , Ana Gabriela Maguitman , Ronald Prescott Loui, Logical models of argument, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.32 n.4, p.337-383, Dec. 2000
	Henry Prakken, Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?, Fundamenta Informaticae, v.48 n.2-3, p.253-271, April 2001