On the relation between legal language and legal argument

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities

Full text

Pdf (861 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents

College Park, Maryland, United States

Pages: 1 - 10

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-758-8

Authors

Henry Prakken	Computer/Law Institute, Free University, De Belelaan 1105 Amsterdam
Giovanni Sartor	CIRFID, University of Bologna, Via Galliera 3, 40121, Bologna, IDG-CNR, 7 Via Panchiatichi 56/16, Firenze

Sponsors

IAAIL : Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law
UMIACS : U of MD Inst for Advanced Comp Studies
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 11

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/222092.222096 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Gerhard Brewka, Reasoning about priorities in default logic, Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 2), p.940-945, October 1994, Seattle, Washington, United States
	2	Phan Minh Dung, An argumentation semantics for logic programming with explicit negation, Proceedings of the tenth international conference on logic programming on Logic programming, p.616-630, August 1993, Budapest, Hungary
	3	D. Gabbay, E~ Laenens and D. Vermeir, Credulous vs. sceptical semantics for ordered logic programs. Proceedings of the Seco~d IrzternatioT~al Confcrcl~ce on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann 1991, 208-217.
	4	Hector Geffner , Judea Pearl, Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, v.53 n.2-3, p.209-244, Feb. 1992 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(92)90071-5]
	5	Thomas F. Gordon, The pleadings game: formalizing procedural justice, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.10-19, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.158978]
	6	J.C. Hage and B. Verheij, Reason-Based Logic: a logic for reasoning with rules and reasons. To appear in Law, Computers and ArtificiaI h, telligence.
	7	A. }Iamfelt and J. Barklund, Metalevcls in legal knowledge and their runnable representation in logic. Preproceedings of the III b~ternational Conference o~ "Logica, Infor- ,,atica, Diritto", Florence 1989, Vol. Ii, 55% 576.
	8	Donald Nute, Defeasible logic, Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 3): nonmonotonic reasoning and uncertain reasoning, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1994
	9	.J.L. Pollock, Defensible re,soiling. Cognitive Science 11 (1987), 481-518.
	10	tI. Prakken, Logical tools for modelling legal argument. Doctoral Dissertation Free University Amsterdam, 1993.
	11	I{. Prakken, An argumentation fi'amework in default logic. AnnaLs of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 9 (~{993), 93-132.
	12	Raz, Practical reason and norms. Princeton Ultiversity Press, 1975.
	13	E.L. Rissl~nd, Artificial httellige}~ce and Law: stepping stogies to a model of legal reasoning. ~tle Law Review vol. 99 (1990), 1957-1981.
	14	Giovanni Sartor, A simple computational model for nonmonotonic and adversarial legal reasoning, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.192-201, June 15-18, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/158976.159001]
	15	G~ Sartor, A formal model of legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 7 (1994), 212-226.
	16	Guillermo R. Simari , Ronald P. Loui, A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation, Artificial Intelligence, v.53 n.2-3, p.125-157, Feb. 1992 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A]
	17	H. Yoshino and M. Kithahara, Les-Project. In II. Fiedler, F. ltag, R. Traunmfiller (eds.): Ezpert systems in law. Impacts on legal theory and computer law. Atternpto Vetlag, T~ibingen, 1988, 47-65.

CITED BY 11

	R. Winkels , D. J. B. Bosscher , A. W. F. Boer , J. A. Breuker, Generating exception structures for legal information serving, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.182-189, June 14-17, 1999, Oslo, Norway
	Carlos Iván Chesñevar , Ana Gabriela Maguitman , Ronald Prescott Loui, Logical models of argument, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.32 n.4, p.337-383, Dec. 2000
	L. Thorne McCarty, Some arguments about legal arguments, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.215-224, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Ronald P. Loui , Jeff Norman , Joe Altepeter , Dan Pinkard , Dan Craven , Jessica Linsday , Mark Foltz, Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.207-214, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia
	Leila Amgoud , Claudette Cayrol, Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks, Journal of Automated Reasoning, v.29 n.2, p.125-169, 2002
	Leila Amgoud , Claudette Cayrol, A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, v.34 n.1-3, p.197-215, March 2002
	Laurence Cholvy, Reasoning About Data Provided By Federated Deductive Databases, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, v.10 n.1, p.49-80, Jan./Feb., 1998
	Ephraim Nissan, Goals, arguments, and deception: A formal representation from the Aurangzeb project. I: An episode from the succession war, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, v.18 n.3, p.281-306, August 2007
	Dorian Gaertner , Francesca Toni, Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation, IEEE Intelligent Systems, v.22 n.6, p.24-33, November 2007
	Alexander Boer, Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web, Proceeding of the 2009 conference on Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web, p.1-316, July 15, 2009
	Gerhard Brewka, Well-founded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic preferences, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, v.4 n.1, p.19-36, Jnauary 1996