ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A brief survey of current work on network attached peripherals (extended abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (725 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review archive
Volume 30 ,  Issue 1  (January 1996) table of contents
Pages: 63 - 70  
Year of Publication: 1996
ISSN:0163-5980
Author
Rodney Van Meter  Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/218646.218650
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Work on network-attached peripherals (NAPs) can be divided into essentially three areas --- device interfaces and protocols, multimedia use and mass storage use. This paper is an extended abstract reviewing some of the current work and provides references and WWW pointers to many of the projects. The impact of this technological advance on operating systems is discussed. The primary purpose of this paper is to broaden understanding of the advantages and pitfalls of NAPs and encourage further research in the design and use of network-attached peripherals and NAP-capable systems. An expanded form of this document is available on the web or from the author.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] File server manages HPC networks. Parallel and Distributed Technology, 2(4):90, 1994. Maximum Strategy product announcement in New Products section.
 
2
[2] J. F. Adam, H. H. Houh, M. Ismert, and D. L. Tennenhouse. Media-intensive data communications in a "desk-area" network. IEEE Communications , pages 60-67, Aug. 1994.
 
3
[3] ANSI. High-performance parallel interface - mechanical, electrical and signalling protocol specification (HIPPI-PH). Technical Report X3T9.3/88-023 rev 8.1, June 1991.
 
4
[4] ANSI. Information systems - fibre channel protocol for SCSI (FCP). Technical Report TR X3T10-993D R010, ANSI, Sept. 1994.
 
5
[5] ANSI. Information technology - SCSI-3 architecture model. Technical Report TR X3T10- 994D R17, ANSI, June 1995.
 
6
[6] P. Barham, M. Hayter, D. McAuley, and I. Pratt. Devices on the desk area network. J. Selected Areas in Communications, 13(4):722-732, May 1995.
 
7
[7] L. Berdahl. Parallel transport protocol proposal. Lawrence Livermore National Labs, January 3, 1995. Draft. ftp://svr4.nersc.gov/pub/Pio-1-3- 95.ps.
8
9
 
10
[10] B. Callaghan, B. Pawlowski, and P. Staubach. NFS version 3 protocol specification, June 1995.
11
 
12
[12] S. Coleman, editor. Twelfth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Apr. 1993.
 
13
[13] S. S. Coleman and R. W. Watson. The emerging paradigm shift in storage system architectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE, pages 607-620, Apr. 1993.
14
 
15
[15] R. Cummings. System architectures using fibre channel. In Coleman [12], pages 251-256.
 
16
17
18
19
 
20
[20] R. Felderman, A. DeSchon, D. Cohen, and G. Finn. ATOMIC: A high speed local communication architecture. J. High Speed Networks, 3(1):1-29, 1994.
21
 
22
[22] M. Fridrich and W. Older. Helix: The architec ture of the XMS distributed file system. IEEE Software, pages 21-29, May 1985.
 
23
[23] G. Gibson. Secure distributed and parallel file systems based on network-attached autonomous disk drives. White paper, Sept. 1995.
24
25
26
27
 
28
[28] D. Hitz. An NFS file server appliance. Technical Report 3001 Rev. B, Network Appliance, Dec. 1994.
 
29
[29] H. H. Houh, J. F. Adam, M. Ismert, C. J. Lindblad, and D. L. Tennenhouse. The vunet desk area network: Architecture, implementation and experience. J. Selected Areas in Communications , 13:710-721, May 1995.
 
30
[30] R. Hyer, R. Ruef, and R. W. Watson. High-performance data transfers using network-attached peripherals at the national storage laboratory. In Coleman [12], pages 275-284.
 
31
[31] IEEE. Proc. Fourteenth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Sept. 1995.
 
32
[32] IEEE P1244. Reference Model for Open Storage Systems Interconnection - Mass Storage System Reference Model Version 5, Sept. 1994.
 
33
[33] R. H. Katz. High-performance network and channel based storage. Proc. IEEE, 90(8):1238- 1261, Aug. 1992.
34
35
36
37
 
38
[38] C. J. Lindblad, D. J. Wetherall, W. F. Stasior, J. F. Adam, H. H. Houh, M. Ismert, D. R. Bacher, B. M. Philips, and D. L. Tennenhouse. Viewstation applications: Implications for network traffic. J. Selected Areas in Communications , 13:768-778, May 1995.
 
39
 
40
[40] E. L. Miller and R. H. Katz. Rama: A file system for massively-parallel computers. In Coleman [12], pages 163-168.
 
41
[41] M. N. Nelson, Y. A. Khalidi, and P. W. Madany. The spring file system. Technical Report SMLI TR-93-10, Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Inc., Feb. 1993.
 
42
[42] Parity Systems. Etherstore product info, 1995.
 
43
 
44
[44] R. Pike, K. Thompson, and H. Trickey. Plan 9 from bell labs. In Proc. Summer 1990 UKUUG Conf., pages 1-9, July 1990.
 
45
 
46
 
47
48
 
49
[49] N. P. Smith. HIPPI - and beyond. Supercomputing Review, pages 69-79, Nov. 1991.
 
50
[50] Solflower Computer. A storage crossbar for unix workstations, Jan. 1995. white paper.
 
51
 
52
[52] Sun Microsystems Inc. NFS: Network file system protocol specification, 1989.
53
 
54
 
55
[55] D. Tolmie. An experimental workstation farm with ATM interconnections and an hdtv frame buffer, email communication from det@lanl.gov, 1994.
 
56
 
57
[57] R. Van Meter. Nxs: X on a network-attached frame buffer. Oct. 1995. in preparation.
 
58
 
59