ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Large-sample theory for standardized time series: an overview
Full text PdfPdf (592 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 17th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
San Francisco, California, United States
Pages: 129 - 134  
Year of Publication: 1985
ISBN:0-911801-07-3
Authors
Peter W. Glynn  Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Donald L. Iglehart  Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/21850.253097
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There are two basic approaches to constructing confidence intervals for steady-state parameters from a single simul t on run. The fir t s to consistently estimate the variance constant in the relevant central limit theorem. This is the approach used in the regenerative, spectral, and autoregressive methods. The second approach (standardized time series, STS) due to SCHRUBEN [10] is to “cancel out” the variance constant. This second approach contains the batch means method as a special case. Our goal in this paper is to discuss the large-simple properties of the confidence intervals generated by the STS method. In particular, the asymptotic (as run size becomes large) expected value and variance of the length of these confidence intervals is studied and shown to be inferior to the behavior manifested by intervals constructed using the first approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bi l I inclsl ey, P., Convergence of Probabil ity I~easures, John Wi } ey, New York, 1968.
 
2
8reimar~, L.., Probability, Addison-Wesley, Readincl, Mass., 1968.
 
3
Glynn, P.W., "Some New Results in Regenerative Process Theory," Technical Report No. 60, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1982.
 
4
Glynn, P.W., "Limit Theorems for the Method of Replication," Technical Summary Report No. 23, Mathematics Research Center, Madison, WI, 1985.
 
5
Glynn, P.W. and D.L. Iglehart, "The Theory of Standardized Time Series," Technical Report No. 32, Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1985.
 
6
Hall, P. and C.C. Heyde, Martingale Limit Theory and its Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1980.
 
7
Iglehart, D.L., "Simulating Stable Stochastic Systems, V: Comparison of Ratio Estimators," May. lles. Logistics Quart., 22, 1975, 553-565.
 
8
Iglehart, D.L., "The Regenerative Method for Simulation Analysis," in Current Trends in Progr~ming Methodology -- Software ModeI ing, (K.M. Chandy and R.T. Hey, editors), Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1978.
 
9
Schrut)en, L., "Detecting Initialization Bias in Simulation Output," Opns. lies., 30, 1982, 569-590.
 
10
Schrul)en, L., "Confidence Interval Estimation Using Standardized Time Series," Opns. iles., 31, 1983, 1090-1108.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter W. Glynn: colleagues
Donald L. Iglehart: colleagues