Design rules based on analyses of human error

ABSTRACT

By analyzing the classes of errors that people make with systems, it is possible to develop principles of system design that minimize both the occurrence of error and the effects. This paper demonstrates some of these principles through the analysis of one class of errors: slips of action. Slips are defined to be situations in which the user's intention was proper, but the results did not conform to that intention. Many properties of existing systems are conducive to slips; from the classification of these errors, some procedures to minimize the occurrence of slips are developed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. Applied Information-Processing Psychology: The Human-Computer Interface. Er}baum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.
• 2: Gentner, D. The Structure of Analogical Models in Science: Technical Report 4451. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Mass, 1980.
• 3: Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. (Eds.), Mental Models. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.
• 4: Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.
• 5: Lockheed Missiles and Space Company. Human factors review of nuclear power plant control room design. EPRI NP-309-SY. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1976.
• 6: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Aircraft incident report: Aero Mexico DC-10-30, XA-DUH over Luxembourg, Europe, November 11, 1979. (NTSB-AAR-80-10). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., November, 1980. (Report available from National Technical Information Service.)
• 7: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Special investigation report: Design-induced landing gear retraction accidents in Beech Baron, Bonanza, and other light aircraft. (NTSB-SR-80-1). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., June, 1980. (Report available from National Technical Information Service.)
• 8: Norman, D. A. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1981, 1-15.
• 9: Norman, D. A. A psychologist views human processing: Human errors and other phenomena suggest processing mechanisms. Invited address, published in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, 1981.
• 10: Norman, D. A. How to make computer systems that people will like to use: Steps toward a cognitive engineering. Proceedings of the Western Electronic Show and Convention (Wescon/82). Anaheim, California, Sept. 15, 1982.
• 11: Norman, D. A. Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.
• 12: Norman, D. A. and Bobrow, D. G. Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1979, 107-123.
• 13: Schneider, M. L., Wexelblat, R. L., and Jende, M. S. Designing control languages from the user's perspective. In D. Beech (Ed.), Command Language Directions: Proceedings of the IFIP TC 2.7 Working Conference on Command Languages. North-Holland Publishing Co., New York, 1980.
• 14: Smith, D. C., Irby, C., Kimball, R., and Verplank, B. Designing the star user interface. Byte 7, 4 (April 1982), 242-282.
• 15: Teitelman, W. and Masinter, L. The Interlisp programming environment. Computer 14, 4 (April 1981), 25-33.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
human errors, human factors, software design