Power over users: its exercise by system professionals

ABSTRACT

Analysis and awareness of the types of power that IS professionals exercise over users can improve the productivity of both parties.

REFERENCES

• 1: Administrationsdepartementet. Kontorteknologi i Staten-En Laereproces (Office Technology in Public Administration-A Learning Process). Administrationsdepartementet, Copenhagen, 1986.
• 2: Bjorn-Andersen, N. Information technology and power change in organizations-Prospects of technology agreements and technology assessments. In Power and Participation in an Information Society, K.W. Grewlich and F.H. Pedersen, Eds. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 1984, pp. 183-201.
• 3: Bjtirn-Andersen, N.. and Kjaergaard, D. Choices en route to the office of tomorrow. In Technology and the Transformation of White Collar Work, R. Kraut, Ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1987.
• 4: Niels Bjo:.KC /rn-Andersen , Ken Eason , Daniel Robey, Managing computer impact: an international study of management and organizations, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1986
• 5: Bj@rn-Andersen, N., Hedberg, B., Mercer, D., Mumford, E., and Sole, A. The Impact of Systems Change in Organizations. Sijthoff and Noordhoff. Leyden, 1979.
• 6: Borum, F., and Enderud, H. Konflikter i Organisationer (Conflict in Organizations). Nyt Nordisk Forlag. Copenhagen, 1981.
• 7: Christensen, S., and Daugard, R.E. Magt 08 Deltagelse (Power and Participation). Institute of Organization and Industrial Sociology, Copenhagen School of Economics and Business Administration, Copenhagen, 1980.
• 8: Ron Dagwell , Ron Weber, System designers' user models: a comparitive study and methodological critique, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.11, p.987-997, Nov. 1983 [doi>10.1145/182.358465]
• 9: Dahl. R.A. Power. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, D.L. Sills, Ed. The Free Press, New York, 1968.
• 10: Daniiger, J.N. The "skill bureaucracy" and intraorganizational control: The case of the data processing unit. Social. Work Occup. 6, 1 (May 1979). 204-226.
• 11: Danziger, J.N., Dutton. W.H., Kling, R., and Kraemer, K.L. Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governnlents. Columbia UniversityPress, New-York, 1982.
• 12: Evans, C. The Mighty Micro. Gollancz, London, 1979.
• 13: Jason L. Frand , Ephraim R. McLean, Summary of the second annual UCLA survey of business school computer usage, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.1, p.12-18, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/5465.6040]
• 14: Charles R. Franz , Daniel Robey, An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.12, p.1202-1209, Dec. 1984 [doi>10.1145/2135.2138]
• 15: Freidson, E. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. Atherton, New York, 1970.
• 16: Hardy, C. The nature of unobtrusive power. \. Man. Stud. 22,4 (July 1985), 384-399.
• 17: Hickson, D.J., Hinings. CR., Lee, CA., Schneck, R.E., and Pennings, J.M. A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power. Adm. Sci. Q. 16, 2 (June 1971), 216-229.
• 18: Hoes, I.R. Systems Annlysis in Public Policy: A Critique (revised edition). University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1983.
• 19: Jangaard, H. Plan og virkelighet (Plan and reality} In Over fil EDB (Introducing EDP), R. H~yer, Ed. Johan Grundt Tanum, Oslo, Norway, 1974, pp. 87-105.
• 20: Peter G. W. Keen, Information systems and organizational change, Communications of the ACM, v.24 n.1, p.24-33, Jan. 1981 [doi>10.1145/358527.358543]
• 21: Keen, P.G.W. Strategic: planning for the new system. In New Office Technology: Human and Organizational Aspects, J. Otway and M. Peltu, Eds. Pinter, London, 1983, pp. 51-67.
• 22: John Leslie King, Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.15 n.4, p.319-349, December 1983 [doi>10.1145/289.290]
• 23: Rob Kling , Suzanne Iacono, The control of information systems developments after implementation, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.12, p.1218-1226, Dec. 1984 [doi>10.1145/2135.358307]
• 24: Kling, R., and Scacchi. W. Computing as social action: The social dynamics of computing in complex organizations. In Advances in Computers, Vol. 19, M. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 1980, pp. 249-327.
• 25: Kling, R., and Scacchi, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Advances in Computers, Vol. 21.
• 26: M. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp. I -90.
• 27: Leavitt, H.J. Applied organization change in industry: Structural, technical and human approaches. In New Perspectives: in Organizational Research, W.W. Cooper, H.J. Leavitt, and M.W. Shelly II, Eds. Wiley, New York, 1964. pp. 55-71.
• 28: Henry C. Lucas, Jr., Organizational power and the information services department, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.1, p.58-65, Jan. 1984 [doi>10.1145/69605.357971]
• 29: Lukes, S. Power: A Radical View. Macmillan, New York, 1974.
• 30: Markus, M.L. Implementation politics: Top management support and user involvement. Syst. Object. So&. 1, 4 (Nov. l!lEl), 203-215.
• 31: M. Lynne Markus, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.6, p.430-444, June 1983 [doi>10.1145/358141.358148]
• 32: Markus, M.L. Systems in Organizations. Pitman, Marshfield. Mass., 1984.
• 33: Markus, M.L.. and Pfeffer, J. Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Account. Organ. Sot. 8, 2-3 (1983), 205-218.
• 34: James Martin, Application Development without Programmers, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1982
• 35: Meyer, M.W. Review of Power in Organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 28, 2 (June 19831, 301-303.
• 36: Enid Mumford, Redesigning Human Systems, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2003
• 37: Pettigrew. A.M. Information control as a power resource. Sociolofl 6, 2 (1972), 187-204.
• 38: Pettigrew, A.M. The Politics of Or,ganizational Decision-Making. Tavistock. London, 1973. I
• 39: Pfeffer, J. Power in Organizations. Pitman. Marshfield, Mass., 1981.
• 40: Salaway, G. An organizational learning approach to information systems development. Work. Pap. 3-85, Graduate School of Management, Computers and Information Systems, Univ. of (California, Los Angeles, 1985.
• 41: Saunders, C.S., and Scarnell, R.W. Intraorganizational distributions of power: Replication research. Acnd. Manage. 1. 25, 2 (Feb. 1982), 192-200.
• 42: Sproull, L., and Hofmeister, K. Implementation: A cognitive approach. Work. Pap., Dept. of Social Sciences, Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa., 1982.
• 43: Strassmann, P.A. Znjormation Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age. The Free Press, New York, 1985.
• 44: Neil E. Swanson, Power: a critical systems development factor, Information and Management, v.9 n.4, p.209-213, Nov. 1985 [doi>10.1016/0378-7206(85)90058-8]
• 45: Sherry Turkle, The second self: computers and the human spirit, Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York, NY, 1984
• 46: Joseph Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, 1976
• 47: Zuboff. S. New worlds of computer-mediated work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 60, 5 (Sept.-Oct. 1982), 142-152.
• 48: Zuboff, S. Automate/informate: The two faces of intelligent technology. Organ. Dyn. 14, 2 (Autumn 1985), 5-18.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing; Human factors

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management