The integration of computing and routine work

ABSTRACT

Most computing serves as a resource or tool to support other work: performing complex analyses for engineering projects, preparing documents, or sending electronic mail using office automation equipment, etc. To improve the character, quality, and ease of computing work, we must understand how automated systems actually are integrated into the work they support. How do people actually adapt to computing as a resource? How do they deal with the unreliability in hardware, software, or operations; data inaccuracy; system changes; poor documentation; inappropriate designs; etc.; which are present in almost every computing milieu, even where computing is widely used and considered highly successful? This paper presents some results of a detailed empirical study of routine computer use in several organizations. We present a theoretical account of computing work and use it to explain a number of observed phenomena, such as:

• How people knowingly use “false” data to obtain desired analytical results by tricking their systems.
• How organizations come to rely upon complex, critical computer systems despite significant, recurrent, known errors and inaccurate data.
• How people work around inadequate computing systems by using manual or duplicate systems, rather than changing their systems via maintenance or enhancement.

In addition, the framework for analyzing computing and routine work presented here proves useful for representing and reasoning about activity in multiactor systems in general, and in understanding how better to integrate organizations of people and computers in which work is coordinated.

REFERENCES

• 1: BECKER, F. Workspace: Creating Environments in Organizations. Praeger, New York, 1981.
• 2: BECKER, H. Art Worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1982.
• 3: S. Bendifallah , W. Scacchi, Understanding software maintenance work, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.13 n.3, p.311-323, March 1987 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1987.233162]
• 4: BENNETT, H.S. On Becoming a Rock Musician. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1980.
• 5: BOSK, C.L. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1979.
• 6: CROZIER, M., AND FRIEDBERG, E. Actors and Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1980.
• 7: CYERT, R., AND MARCH, J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.
• 8: David Dery, Computers in Welfare: The MIS-Match, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 1981
• 9: ESTR{N, D., AND GASSER, L. Applying distributed problem-solving to large, multi-organization, heterogeneous internetworks. Working Paper, Computer Science Dept. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.
• 10: FAULKNER, R. Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, N.J., 1983.
• 11: FI~ES, R. A commitment-based framework for describing informal cooperative work. Cognitive Sci. 6 (1982), 331-347.
• 12: Leslie George Gasser, The social dynamics of routine computer use in complex organizations (work, management, sociology), 1984
• 13: GASSER, L. MACE: A multi-agent computing environment. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.
• 14: GASSER, L. Negotiated order: Concerted action in multi-agent systems. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.
• 15: GERSON, E. On quality of life. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41 (Oct. 1976), 793-806.
• 16: GERSON, E. Scientific work and social worlds. Knowledge 3 (Mar. 1983), 357-377.
• 17: Elihu M. Gerson , Susan L. Star, Analyzing due process in the workplace, Proceedings of the third ACM-SIGOIS conference on Office information systems, p.70-78, October 06-08, 1986, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
• 18: HEWITT, C., AND DE JONG, P. Open systems. In On Conceptual Modeling. M. L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulous, and J. W. Schmidt, Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984, pp. 147-164.
• 19: HUGHES, E.C. Men and Their Work. Free Press, New York, 1958.
• 20: INBAR, M. Routine Decision Making: The Future of Bureaucracy. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1979.
• 21: Rob Kling, Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.6, p.484-493, June 1978 [doi>10.1145/359511.359528]
• 22: R. Kling, Defining the boundaries of computing across complex organizations, Critical issues in information systems research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1987
• 23: SLING, R., AND IACONO, S. Behind the terminal: The backstage organization of computing in organizations. Working Paper, Public Policy Research Organization, Univ. of California, Irvine, 1983.
• 24: SLING, R., AND SCACCHI, W. Recurrent dilemmas of computer use in complex organizations. In Proceedings of the 1979 National Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1979, pp. 573-581.
• 25: SLING, R., AND SCACCHi, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. In Advances in Computers, M. C. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1982, pp. 1-89.
• 26: KUSTERER, K. Knowhow on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of "Unskilled" Workers. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., 1979.
• 27: LOFLAND, J. Doing Social Life: The Qualitative Study of Human Interaction ~n Natural Settings. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1976.
• 28: Henry C. Lucas, Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1981
• 29: Mari Malvey , Aaron Wildavsky, Simple Systems, Complex Environments; Hospital Financial Information Systems, SAGE Publications, 1981
• 30: MARCH, J., AND SIMON, H. Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1958.
• 31: McCuE, G.M. IBM's Santa Teresa Laboratory: Architectural design for program development. IBM Syst. J. 17 (1978), 4-25.
• 32: Joseph A. Orlicky, Material Requirements Planning: The New Way of Life in Production and Inventory Management, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1974
• 33: REIMER, J. Hard Hats: The Work World of Construction Workers. Sage, Beverly Hills., Calif., 1979.
• 34: SCACCH,, W., GASSER, L., AND GERSON, E. Problems and strategies in organizing computeraided design work. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (Oct.). IEEE, New York, 1983.
• 35: SCACCHI, W., BENDIFALLAH, S., BLOCH, A., CHOI, S., GARG, P., JAZZAR, A., SAFAVI, A., SKEER, Z., AND TURNER, M. Modeling the software process: A knowledge-based approach. Working Paper, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1986.
• 36: STRAUSS, A. Negotiations." Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1978.
• 37: STRAUSS, A., FAGERHAUGH, S., SUZCEK, B., AND WEINER, C. The Social Organization o{Medical Work. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1985.
• 38: THOMPSON, J.D. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
• 39: WEICK, K. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.
• 40: WIC, HT, O.W. Production and Inventory Management in the Computer Age. Cahners Books, Boston, Mass., 1974.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  J. Computer Applications
  J.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING
      Subjects: Manufacturing

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
articulation work, computing and work, computing in organizations, integration of computing, multiagent systems, social analysis of computing, workarounds