The spin-off illusion

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The spin-off illusion: reuse is not a by-product

Full text

Pdf (328 KB)

Source

Symposium on Software Reusability archive
Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software reusability table of contents

Seattle, Washington, United States

Pages: 219 - 221

Year of Publication: 1995

ISBN:0-89791-739-1

Also published in ...

Author

Michael Wasmund

IBM Deutschhmd Entwicklung GmbH, Postfach 1380, D-71032 Boeblingen

Sponsor

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 15, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/211782.211848 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Based on the desire of enterprise management to find a smooth, low-risk way of introducing reuse methodology, this paper discusses several approaches taken. The illusion of using the by-product of software development to obtain reusable assets is the subject of the second approach. The third successful approach follows the software factory paradigm and has been successfully implemented at several IBM sites.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Ted Davis, Adopting a policy of reuse, IEEE Spectrum, v.31 n.6, p.44-48, June 1994 [doi>10.1109/6.284792]
	2	James W. Hooper , R. O. Chester, Software Reuse: Guidelines and Methods, Perseus Publishing, 1991
	3	David Lorge Parnas, Software aging, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, p.279-287, May 16-21, 1994, Sorrento, Italy
	4	T. J. Biggerstaff, "The Limits of Concrete Component Reuse," Proc. of 6th Annual Workshop on Software Reuse, Nov. 2-4, 1993, Owego, New York.
	5	Ted J. Biggerstaff, Design Recovery for Maintenance and Reuse, Computer, v.22 n.7, p.36-49, July 1989 [doi>10.1109/2.30731]
	6	Alistair A. R. Cockburn, The impact of object-orientation on application development, IBM Systems Journal, v.32 n.3, p.420-444, August 1993
	7	Victor R. Basili , Gianluigi Caldiera , Giovanni Cantone, A reference architecture for the component factory, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), v.1 n.1, p.53-80, Jan. 1992 [doi>10.1145/125489.122823]
	8	Will Tracz, Where does reuse start?, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.15 n.2, p.42-46, April 1990 [doi>10.1145/382296.382702]
	9	Gianluigi Caldiera , Victor R. Basili, Identifying and Qualifying Reusable Software Components, Computer, v.24 n.2, p.61-70, February 1991 [doi>10.1109/2.67210]
	10	Jeffrey S. Poulin , Joseph M. Caruso , Debera R. Hancock, The business case for software reuse, IBM Systems Journal, v.32 n.4, p.567-594, October 1993
	11	Garg et al., "A Meta-Process for Software Reuse Process Discovery and Evolution.". Proc. of 6th Annual Workshop on Software Reuse, Nov. 2-4, 1993, Owego, New York.
	12	S. S. Redwine, Jr. , W. E. Riddle, Software reuse processes, Proceedings of the 4th international software process workshop on Representing and enacting the software process, p.133-135, April 1988, Devon, United Kingdom
	13	Michael Wasmund, Implementing critical success factors in software reuse, IBM Systems Journal, v.32 n.4, p.595-611, October 1993
	14	M. Wasmund, "Incentives versus Targets- A practical Experience," Proc. of 4th IEEE Computer' Society Workshop on Software Engineering Technology Transfer, April 28-29, 1994, Dallas, Texas.
	15	M. D. Lubars, "Frameworks versus Libraries: A Dichotomy of Reuse Strategies," t'roc, of Ottt Annual Workshop on Software Reuse, Nov. 2-4, 1993., Owe~o, New York.