Reuse through inheritance: a quantitative study of C++ software

ABSTRACT

According to proponents of object-oriented programming, inheritance is an excellent way to organize abstraction and a superb tool for reuse. Yet, few quantitative studies of the actual use of inheritance have been conducted. Quantitative studies are necessary to evaluate the actual usefulness of structures such as inheritance. We characterize the use of inheritance in 19 existing C++ software systems containing 2,744 classes. We measure the class depth in the inheritance hierarchies, and the number of child and parent classes in the software. We find that inheritance is used far less frequently than expected.

REFERENCES

• 1: James M. Bieman, Deriving Measures of Software Reuse in Object Oriented Systems, Proceedings of the BCS-FACS Workshop on Formal Aspects of Measurement, p.63-83, May 05, 1991
• 2: James M. Bieman , Byung-Kyoo Kang, Cohesion and reuse in an object-oriented system, Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software reusability, p.259-262, April 29-30, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States
• 3: James M. Bieman , Santhi Karunanithi, Measurement of language-supported reuse in object-oriented and object-based software, Journal of Systems and Software, v.30 n.3, p.271-293, Sept. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0164-1212(94)00138-D]
• 4: J. M. Bieman , L. M. Ott, Measuring Functional Cohesion, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.8, p.644-657, August 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.310673]
• 5: Grady Booch, Object-oriented analysis and design with applications (2nd ed.), Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1993
• 6: Tom Cargill, C++ programming style, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1992
• 7: S. R. Chidamber , C. F. Kemerer, A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.20 n.6, p.476-493, June 1994 [doi>10.1109/32.295895]
• 8: Brad J. Cox, Planning the Software Industrial Revolution, IEEE Software, v.7 n.6, p.25-33, November 1990 [doi>10.1109/52.60587]
• 9: Premkumar T. Devanbu, GENOA: a customizable language- and front-end independent code analyzer, Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering, p.307-317, May 11-15, 1992, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/143062.143148]
• 10: Norman E. Fenton, Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach, Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, UK, 1991
• 11: Norman Fenton , Shari Lawrence Pfleeger , Robert L. Glass, Science and Substance: A Challenge to Software Engineers, IEEE Software, v.11 n.4, p.86-95, July 1994 [doi>10.1109/52.300094]
• 12: Al Lake , Curtis R. Cook, A Software Complexity Metric for C++, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 1992
• 13: Gary T. Leavens, Modular Specification and Verification of Object-Oriented Programs, IEEE Software, v.8 n.4, p.72-80, July 1991 [doi>10.1109/52.300040]
• 14: Mike Stark, Impacts of object-oriented technologies: seven years of software engineering, Journal of Systems and Software, v.23 n.2, p.163-169, Nov. 1993 [doi>10.1016/0164-1212(93)90081-8]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.m Miscellaneous
          Subjects: Reusable software**

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.1 PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES

General Terms:
Measurement, Theory